Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Tennessee HouseHB 2069

Local Government, General - As introduced, requires proposed contingent fee contracts for legal services between a political subdivision of this state and a private-sector attorney to be approved by the attorney general and reporter prior to…

Failed 36–32Crossed party lines

What it does: This bill authorizes a political subdivision to only enter into a contingent fee contract for legal services if the governing body of the political subdivision adheres to all of the following requirements:  Calls a public meeting for the purpose of considering the contract and provides in the notice of the meeting (i) the reasons for pursuing the matter that is the subject of the legal services being procured and the desired outcome of pursuing the matter; (ii) the qualifications, experience, and competence of the attorney or law firm proposed for retention by the governing body; (iii) the… (official summary)

Question before the chamber: REGULAR CALENDAR AS AMENDED PASSAGE ON THIRD CONSIDERATION

Read the official record ↗

The tally

Yes 36 · No 32 · Not voting 8 · Present 22

Bar: green = yes, brown = no, striped = not voting.

Votes by party
PartyYesNoNot voting / present
Democrats0194
Republicans36134 / 22

Most Democrats voted no; most Republicans voted yes. 13 members voted against their party’s majority.

Voted against their party’s majority

The full roll (98)

Yes 36

No 32

Present 22

Not voting 8

“Not voting” is a recorded non-vote, not a reason for the absence. Parties come from public rosters; how we count.