Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Karen YoungPhoto: mgaleg.maryland.gov

MD · Officeholder

Karen Young

DState Senator · District 3

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Maryland Senate District 3

Biography

Karen Young is a Democratic Maryland state senator from District 3 in Frederick County who has held the seat since January 2023 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election.[1][2][3] She previously served on the Frederick Board of Aldermen and in the House of Delegates and worked in banking and market research.[1][2]

Karen Lewis Young was born in the Bronx, New York, on June 21, 1951, and graduated from Montoursville Area High School in 1969.[2] She earned a B.A. in history from Franklin and Marshall College in 1973 and, from Columbia University, an M.A. in American history in 1974 and an M.B.A. in 1977.[2] Her career included senior vice president and chief marketing officer at Farmers & Merchants' National Bank, positions at Claritas, Allfirst and Capital One, and ownership of Karen Lewis Market Research.[2]

Young served as president pro tem of the City of Frederick's Board of Aldermen from 2009 to 2013.[2] She represented District 3A in the Maryland House of Delegates from 2015 to 2023 and assumed office in the state Senate on January 11, 2023.[1] According to the General Assembly website, she serves on the Budget and Taxation Committee.[2]

  1. 1.Karen Lewis Young · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Senator Karen Young - Maryland General Assembly member page · Maryland General Assembly · 2026-10-21 Official record
  3. 3.Maryland State Senate elections, 2026 · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Maryland Senate District 3

Karen Young is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Maryland Senate District 3 as D. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Democrats voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 6 of 463 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Rights & public safety (4), Jobs & cost of living (2)

  • Prince George's County - State's Attorney Salary - Alteration PG 426-26

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 2–29, Republicans 13–0

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Criminal Procedure - District Court - Issuance of Summonses and Arrest Warrants

    What it does: Bars court commissioners from issuing arrest warrants on criminal complaints filed by private citizens, allowing summonses instead; requires such complaints be sworn under penalty of perjury, raises the penalty for fa…

    Voted no · most Democrats voted yes · Democrats 29–4, Republicans 6–7

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Criminal Procedure - District Court - Issuance of Summonses and Arrest Warrants

    What it does: Bars court commissioners from issuing arrest warrants on criminal complaints filed by private citizens, allowing summonses instead; requires such complaints be sworn under penalty of perjury, raises the penalty for fa…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 5–28, Republicans 7–6

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Prince George's County - State's Attorney Salary - Alteration PG 426-26

    Amends the bill to also set the Frederick County sheriff's salary at $125,000 in 2026 and $175,000 in 2027, then 82.5% of the State's Attorney's salary, and to let the Talbot County Council set its State's Attorney's salary from 2028. (AI-written)

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 9–22, Republicans 13–0

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Public Ethics - Members of the General Assembly - State and Local Government Employment Exemption

    What it does: On the version voted Apr 13, 2026: Creates a temporary Task Force on Legislator Employment, including ethics committee chairs, local government groups and public members, to study rules on state lawmakers working for…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 2–26, Republicans 11–1

    Mar 23, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Bill is on Third Reading for Final Passage.

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Hershey /213220/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 12–32·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Gallion /473622/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–30·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Simonaire /713626/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 14–28·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Ready /393120/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–31·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Salling /763427/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 14–30·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment West /943226/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–31·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · (Const) · Suspended Rule 24 to allow two readings of a bill in the same day

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2101 · MD SENATE

Arbitration Reform for State Employees Act of 2026 - Withdraw and Repeal of Duplicate Proposed Constitutional Amendment

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.72 · (Emerg) · Suspended Rule 24 to allow two readings of a bill in the same day

Repeals a duplicate proposed constitutional amendment on collective bargaining for State employees, so only one copy appears on the November 2026 ballot. An identical amendment in another act stays on the ballot. Takes effect immediately as an emergency.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Education, Energy, and the Environment Report No. 54 · (Const) · Motion to limit debate

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 31–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 630 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.