An Act Regarding Court Security
What it does: As introduced, requires the State Court Administrator to contract for court security when a lack of security disrupts more than 2% of a court's scheduled time in a month, offering the contract first to the county sheriff's office. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)
Question before the chamber: INSIST AND ASK FOR COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE — Insist and Ask for Committee of Conference (L.D. 1032) (H.P. 661)
The tally
Yes 16 · No 17 · Not voting 2
Bar: green = yes, brown = no, striped = not voting.
| Party | Yes | No | Not voting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats | 1 | 17 | 2 |
| Republicans | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Other or unknown party | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Most Democrats voted no; most Republicans voted yes. 1 member voted against their party’s majority.
Voted against their party’s majority
- Joe BaldacciD9Yes
The full roll (35)
Yes 16
No 17
Not voting 2
“Not voting” is a recorded non-vote, not a reason for the absence. Parties come from public rosters; how we count.