Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Johnny MautzPhoto: mgaleg.maryland.gov

MD · Officeholder

Johnny Mautz

RState Senator · District 37

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Maryland Senate District 37

Biography

Johnny Mautz is a Republican Maryland state senator from District 37 on the Eastern Shore who has held the seat since January 2023 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election.[1][2][3] An attorney by training, he previously served in the House of Delegates from 2015 to 2023.[1][2]

Johnny Mautz was born in Fort Devens, Massachusetts, on September 19, 1970, and attended Brewster Academy in Wolfeboro, New Hampshire.[2] He earned a B.A. in political science from the University of Dayton in 1994 and a J.D. from the Pettit College of Law at Ohio Northern University in 1997.[2] Mautz served as counsel to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee from 1997 to 2002, as a special assistant in the office of Gov. Robert Ehrlich from 2002 to 2005, and as legislative director to U.S. Rep. Howard Coble from 2009 to 2014.[2] He has also managed the Carpenter Street Saloon in St. Michaels.[2]

Mautz represented District 37B in the Maryland House of Delegates from 2015 to 2023.[1] He assumed office in the state Senate on January 11, 2023, succeeding Adelaide Eckardt.[1] According to the General Assembly website, he serves on the Finance Committee.[2]

  1. 1.Johnny Mautz · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Senator Johnny Mautz - Maryland General Assembly member page · Maryland General Assembly · 2026-10-21 Official record
  3. 3.Maryland State Senate elections, 2026 · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Maryland Senate District 37

Johnny Mautz is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Maryland Senate District 37 as R. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Republicans voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 15 of 472 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Health & care (5), Rights & public safety (4), Jobs & cost of living (4)

  • County Boards of Education - Opioid Overdose-Reversing Medications - Policy Requirements (Naloxone Access Act)

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 26–0, Republicans 5–6

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Criminal Procedure - District Court - Issuance of Summonses and Arrest Warrants

    What it does: Bars court commissioners from issuing arrest warrants on criminal complaints filed by private citizens, allowing summonses instead; requires such complaints be sworn under penalty of perjury, raises the penalty for fa…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 5–28, Republicans 7–6

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Business Regulation - Rounding Cash Transactions - Authorization

    What it does: Allows merchants to round cash transaction prices and change to the nearest five cents, excludes rounding amounts of up to two cents from sales tax, and overrides conflicting existing regulations, rules and local ordi…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 34–0, Republicans 2–11

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Criminal Procedure - Evidence - Protecting Artists' Creative Expression (PACE Act)

    What it does: On the version voted Apr 8, 2026: Bars a defendant's creative expression, such as music, poetry or film, from being used as evidence in criminal or juvenile cases unless a court finds it was meant literally, closely t…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 30–0, Republicans 2–10

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

  • Business Regulation - Rounding Cash Transactions - Authorization

    What it does: Allows merchants to round cash transaction prices to the nearest five cents, rounding 1, 2, 6 and 7 cents down and 3, 4, 8 and 9 cents up. Exempts up to two cents of rounding from sales tax and overrides conflicting l…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 30–0, Republicans 2–11

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Bill is on Third Reading for Final Passage.

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Hershey /213220/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 12–32·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Gallion /473622/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–30·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Simonaire /713626/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 14–28·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Ready /393120/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–31·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Salling /763427/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 14–30·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment West /943226/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–31·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · (Const) · Suspended Rule 24 to allow two readings of a bill in the same day

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2101 · MD SENATE

Arbitration Reform for State Employees Act of 2026 - Withdraw and Repeal of Duplicate Proposed Constitutional Amendment

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.72 · (Emerg) · Suspended Rule 24 to allow two readings of a bill in the same day

Repeals a duplicate proposed constitutional amendment on collective bargaining for State employees, so only one copy appears on the November 2026 ballot. An identical amendment in another act stays on the ballot. Takes effect immediately as an emergency.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Education, Energy, and the Environment Report No. 54 · (Const) · Motion to limit debate

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 31–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 630 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.