Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu

MD · Officeholder

Jack Bailey

RState Senator · District 29

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Maryland Senate District 29

Biography

Jack Bailey is a Republican Maryland state senator from District 29 who has represented Calvert and St. Mary's counties since January 2019 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election.[1][2][3] A former Maryland Natural Resources Police officer, he serves on the Budget and Taxation Committee.[2]

Jack Bailey was born in Elkton, Maryland, on August 27, 1965, and graduated from St. Mary's Ryken High School in 1983.[2] He earned a B.S. in management from Johns Hopkins University in 2013 and an M.S. in management from the university in 2014.[2] Bailey served as a Maryland Natural Resources Police officer from 1991 to 2004 and later held positions including executive assistant to the superintendent and sergeant supervising the Covert Operations Unit, ending in 2017.[2] Since 2017 he has been an instructor and coach with the International Conservation Chiefs Academy.[2]

Bailey assumed office in the Maryland State Senate on January 9, 2019, succeeding Stephen Waugh, and he advanced from the Republican primary on June 23, 2026.[1]

  1. 1.Jack Bailey (Maryland) · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Senator Jack Bailey - Maryland General Assembly member page · Maryland General Assembly · 2026-10-21 Official record
  3. 3.Maryland State Senate elections, 2026 · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Maryland Senate District 29

Jack Bailey is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Maryland Senate District 29 as R. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Republicans voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 18 of 461 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Climate & energy (10), Jobs & cost of living (4), Health & care (3)

  • Cannabis - Advertising - Alterations

    What it does: Changes cannabis advertising rules: allows dispensaries more exterior signage, changes how audience age is determined, requires regulations accepting event organizers' attestations on audience composition, and lowers…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 33–0, Republicans 5–8

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Hunting - Lead and Lead-Based Ammunition - Phase-Out

    What it does: On the version voted Mar 23, 2026: Requires the Department of Natural Resources to mandate nonlead ammunition for hunting all game by July 1, 2030, except where nonlead ammunition is not commercially available for a s…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 30–0, Republicans 2–10

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

  • Montgomery County - Community Choice Aggregation Pilot Program - Alterations MC 17-26

    What it does: Changes Montgomery County's community choice aggregation pilot: the start date becomes the earlier of notice to the Public Service Commission or April 1, 2026. It extends the pilot from seven to nine years and moves r…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 24–0, Republicans 1–8

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

  • Hunting - Restrictions of Venison Donation

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 24–0, Republicans 1–8

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

  • Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays Critical Area Protection Program - Variances - Alterations

    What it does: On the version voted Mar 18, 2026: Changes Critical Area variance standards, including a rebuttable presumption that an existing accessory structure shows reasonable and significant use when a new one is requested, an…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 29–0, Republicans 4–8

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Bill is on Third Reading for Final Passage.

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Hershey /213220/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 12–32·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Gallion /473622/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–30·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Simonaire /713626/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 14–28·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Ready /393120/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–31·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Salling /763427/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 14–30·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment West /943226/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–31·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · (Const) · Suspended Rule 24 to allow two readings of a bill in the same day

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2101 · MD SENATE

Arbitration Reform for State Employees Act of 2026 - Withdraw and Repeal of Duplicate Proposed Constitutional Amendment

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.72 · (Emerg) · Suspended Rule 24 to allow two readings of a bill in the same day

Repeals a duplicate proposed constitutional amendment on collective bargaining for State employees, so only one copy appears on the November 2026 ballot. An identical amendment in another act stays on the ballot. Takes effect immediately as an emergency.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Education, Energy, and the Environment Report No. 54 · (Const) · Motion to limit debate

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 31–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 630 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.