Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu

MD · Officeholder

J.B. Jennings

RState Senator · District 7

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Maryland Senate District 7

Biography

J.B. Jennings is the Republican state senator for Maryland District 7, in office since January 2011, and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election. A pilot and dairy farmer, he served in the Maryland House of Delegates from 2002 to 2010.[1][2]

Jennings earned an associate degree from Essex Community College in 1995 and a bachelor's degree from the University of Baltimore in 1997, and he served in the U.S. Air National Guard.[1] His professional experience includes working as co-owner and president of The Mill of Hereford, as a volunteer firefighter with the Jacksonville Volunteer Fire Company, and as a dairy farmer with Cedar Side Farm.[1]

Jennings served in the House of Delegates from 2002 to 2010 and took his Senate seat on January 12, 2011.[1] In the 2025-2026 term he serves on the Budget & Taxation and Rules committees, among others.[1]

  1. 1.J.B. Jennings - Ballotpedia · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Maryland State Senate elections, 2026 - Ballotpedia · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Maryland Senate District 7

J.B. Jennings is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Maryland Senate District 7 as R. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Republicans voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 48 of 460 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Jobs & cost of living (17), Health & care (9), Rights & public safety (8)

  • Cannabis - Advertising - Alterations

    What it does: Changes cannabis advertising rules: allows dispensaries more exterior signage, changes how audience age is determined, requires regulations accepting event organizers' attestations on audience composition, and lowers…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 33–0, Republicans 5–8

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • County Boards of Education - Opioid Overdose-Reversing Medications - Policy Requirements (Naloxone Access Act)

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 26–0, Republicans 5–6

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Criminal Procedure - District Court - Issuance of Summonses and Arrest Warrants

    What it does: Bars court commissioners from issuing arrest warrants on criminal complaints filed by private citizens, allowing summonses instead; requires such complaints be sworn under penalty of perjury, raises the penalty for fa…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 29–4, Republicans 6–7

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Video Tolls - Class G (Trailer) Vehicles - Liability

    What it does: On the version voted Mar 4, 2026: Makes the registered owner of a Class G (trailer) vehicle liable for a video toll if the towing vehicle's registered owner cannot be determined, and applies existing video-toll collec…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 31–0, Republicans 4–8

    Apr 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Insurance - Certificates of Guarantee for County Bond Requirements - All Counties

    What it does: On the version voted Mar 8, 2026: Lets any county, instead of only specified counties, accept certificates of guarantee issued by a nonprofit contractors' association or its subsidiary to meet county bond requirements.

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 30–0, Republicans 3–8

    Apr 10, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Bill is on Third Reading for Final Passage.

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Hershey /213220/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 12–32·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Gallion /473622/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–30·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Simonaire /713626/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 14–28·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Ready /393120/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–31·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment Salling /763427/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 14–30·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

YesVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · Floor Amendment West /943226/1

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 13–31·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.73 · (Const) · Suspended Rule 24 to allow two readings of a bill in the same day

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2101 · MD SENATE

Arbitration Reform for State Employees Act of 2026 - Withdraw and Repeal of Duplicate Proposed Constitutional Amendment

NoVOTED

Motion: Third Reading (HB) Calendar No.72 · (Emerg) · Suspended Rule 24 to allow two readings of a bill in the same day

Repeals a duplicate proposed constitutional amendment on collective bargaining for State employees, so only one copy appears on the November 2026 ballot. An identical amendment in another act stays on the ballot. Takes effect immediately as an emergency.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 32–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2100 · MD SENATE

Election Districts - General Assembly and Representatives in Congress

NoVOTED

Motion: Education, Energy, and the Environment Report No. 54 · (Const) · Motion to limit debate

On the version voted Aug 3, 2026: Proposes a constitutional amendment for the November 2026 ballot stating that the Maryland Constitution sets no criteria for congressional district lines, that its districting standards apply only to legislative districts, and that lawmakers may give the state Supreme Court original review of congressional maps.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 31–13·Substantive·Aug 4, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 630 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.