Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Charles SchwertnerPhoto: senate.texas.gov

TX · Officeholder

Charles Schwertner

RState Senator · District 5

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Texas Senate District 5

Biography

Charles Schwertner is a Republican member of the Texas State Senate who has represented District 5 since 2013 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election. He chairs the Senate Business & Commerce Committee and previously served in the Texas House of Representatives.[1][2]

Schwertner represented District 20 in the Texas House of Representatives from 2011 to 2013 and assumed office in the State Senate in 2013, according to Ballotpedia.[1] In 2023-2024 he chaired the Business & Commerce Committee and was also assigned to the Finance and Senate State Affairs committees, along with the Committee of the Whole Senate.[1] He advanced from the Republican primary on March 3, 2026.[1] Schwertner and his wife, Belinda, have three children.[1]

In a Ballotpedia survey, Schwertner said he authored Texas' 287(g) immigration enforcement law, which requires sheriffs to enter agreements with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and that he passed laws on prayer and the Ten Commandments in classrooms and on DEI programs.[2] He said his priorities include continued property tax reductions and, as chairman of the Business & Commerce Committee, ensuring reliable and affordable electricity.[2]

  1. 1.Charles Schwertner · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Charles Schwertner - Candidate Connection survey (2026) · Ballotpedia Candidate's own words

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Texas Senate District 5

Charles Schwertner is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Texas Senate District 5 as R. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Republicans voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 4 of 583 party-divided votes on file.

  • Relating to disannexation of certain areas of a municipality for failure to provide services

    What it does: On the version voted May 15, 2025: Lets a majority of property owners, rather than voters, petition to remove an area from a city that fails to provide services, adds areas along navigable waterways not connected to c…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 5–6, Republicans 17–3

    May 6, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the collection of state and local hotel occupancy taxes and assessments related to hotels by an accommodations intermediary

    What it does: Requires online booking companies and other accommodations intermediaries to collect state and local hotel occupancy taxes on rooms booked through them and send them to the comptroller, and relieves hotels of collecti…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 11–0, Republicans 9–10

    Apr 10, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the collection of state and local hotel occupancy taxes and assessments related to hotels by an accommodations intermediary

    What it does: Requires online booking companies and other accommodations intermediaries to collect state and local hotel occupancy taxes on rooms booked through them and send them to the comptroller, and relieves hotels of collecti…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 11–0, Republicans 9–10

    Apr 10, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the use by a political subdivision of public funds for lobbying and certain other activities

    What it does: Bars political subdivisions from spending public funds to hire registered lobbyists to lobby legislators or to pay associations of governments that contract with them, with exceptions for officials, employees and sher…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 8–0, Republicans 7–13

    Mar 19, 2025Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 18 · TX SENATE

Relating to a restriction on the acceptance of political contributions and the making of certain political expenditures by a member of the legislature and certain political committees during certain periods in which a member is absent from a legislative session; authorizing a civil penalty

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

Bars legislators who leave the state to block legislative action, and committees supporting them, from accepting contributions above a daily per diem from any one donor or spending campaign money on travel, food or lodging for the absence; violations carry civil penalties up to $5,000.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 4, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 18 · TX SENATE

Relating to a restriction on the acceptance of political contributions and the making of certain political expenditures by a member of the legislature and certain political committees during certain periods in which a member is absent from a legislative session; authorizing a civil penalty

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Sep 4, 2025: Bars legislators who leave the state to block legislative action, and committees supporting them, from accepting contributions above a daily per diem from any one donor or spending campaign money on travel, food or lodging for the absence; violations carry civil penalties up to $5,000.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 7 · TX SENATE

Relating to prohibitions on the manufacture and provision of abortion-inducing drugs, including the jurisdiction of and effect of certain judgments by courts within and outside this state with respect to the manufacture and provision of those drugs, and to protections from certain counteractions under the laws of other states and jurisdictions; authorizing qui tam actions

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Bans manufacturing or distributing abortion-inducing drugs in Texas, and mailing, delivering or prescribing them to or from Texas, with exceptions such as medical emergencies. Only private qui tam suits (at least $100,000 per violation) enforce it; women who take the drugs cannot be sued.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 17–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 8 · TX SENATE

Relating to the designation and use of certain spaces and facilities according to sex; authorizing a civil penalty and a private civil right of action

YesVOTED

Motion: Concur in House amendments

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Tables an amendment that would strike the bill's provisions barring courts from blocking its enforcement or certifying classes, and making parties who seek such court orders pay the other side's costs and attorney fees.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 15 · TX SENATE

Relating to certain files maintained by a law enforcement agency regarding certain employees of the agency

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Requires law enforcement agencies to keep a confidential file on each officer, holding records outside the personnel file, including misconduct allegations lacking sufficient evidence. Allows review by hiring agencies, the state licensing commission, and complainants and alleged victims; bars other release.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 26–1·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 26–1·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt Floor Amendment No. 1 (Nichols)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 20–7·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 15 · TX SENATE

Relating to certain files maintained by a law enforcement agency regarding certain employees of the agency

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Requires law enforcement agencies to keep a confidential file on each officer, holding records outside the personnel file, including misconduct allegations lacking sufficient evidence. Allows review by hiring agencies, the state licensing commission, and complainants and alleged victims; bars other release.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 7 · TX SENATE

Relating to prohibitions on the manufacture and provision of abortion-inducing drugs, including the jurisdiction of and effect of certain judgments by courts within and outside this state with respect to the manufacture and provision of those drugs, and to protections from certain counteractions under the laws of other states and jurisdictions; authorizing qui tam actions

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Bans manufacturing or distributing abortion-inducing drugs in Texas, and mailing, delivering or prescribing them to or from Texas, with exceptions such as medical emergencies. Only private qui tam suits (at least $100,000 per violation) enforce it; women who take the drugs cannot be sued.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 17–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 1306 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.