Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Bryant WolfinPhoto: s3.amazonaws.com

MO · Officeholder

Bryant Wolfin

RState Representative · District 145

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Missouri House District 145

Biography

Bryant Wolfin is a Republican state representative who has represented Missouri House District 145 since 2025 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election.[1][2] Wolfin owns a convenience store business with his wife and is a former Ste. Genevieve alderman.[3]

Bryant Wolfin earned an associate degree in business management from Mineral Area College in 2011.[1] His career experience includes owning BMW Convenience LLC.[1] In a Ballotpedia survey, he described himself as a former Ste. Genevieve alderman and volunteer youth sports coach.[3]

Wolfin took office on January 8, 2025, succeeding Rick Francis, and for 2025-2026 Ballotpedia lists him on the Local Government Committee.[1] In the survey, he said he would work to defend individual liberties and to shrink the role of government.[3]

  1. 1.Bryant Wolfin · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Missouri House of Representatives elections, 2026 · Ballotpedia Reference
  3. 3.Bryant Wolfin - Candidate Connection survey (2024) · Ballotpedia Candidate's own words

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Missouri House District 145

Bryant Wolfin is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Missouri House District 145 as R. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Republicans voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 106 of 337 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Jobs & cost of living (42), Rights & public safety (37), Education & families (21)

  • Relating to sheriffs

    What it does: Submits to voters an amendment requiring most counties to elect a sheriff to a four-year term as chief law enforcement officer, with set duties such as jailing felons and attending circuit court, removable only by quo…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 0–45, Republicans 95–1

    May 15, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to sheriffs

    A yes vote adopted the conference committee report on SJR 87, the compromise version of the proposed constitutional amendment on county sheriffs, which then went to a final vote. (AI-written)

    What it does: Submits to voters an amendment requiring most counties to elect a sheriff to a four-year term as chief law enforcement officer, with set duties such as jailing felons and attending circuit court, removable only by quo…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 0–45, Republicans 95–1

    May 15, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to school board elections

    What it does: Moves school board elections in districts mostly in counties of 400,000 to 500,000 people to November of even-numbered years from 2028 with four-year terms, lets candidates choose to list a party, and puts school tax…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 0–49, Republicans 81–17

    May 15, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to creation of a sovereign wealth fund for the state of Missouri

    What it does: Submits to voters an amendment creating the Show-Me Prosperity Fund, invested in S&P 500 index funds. Once its earnings can replace the revenue, appropriations capped at 3% of its five-year average value may be used s…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 0–48, Republicans 85–8

    May 15, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to abortion

    What it does: Revises assault and stalking offenses; creates cyberharassment, cyberstalking, intimate digital depiction and sadistic online exploitation offenses; requires providers to give a child born alive after an abortion the…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 0–44, Republicans 102–2

    May 13, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 2017 · MO HOUSE

Appropriations bill

NoVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote would have ended debate and forced an immediate vote on House Resolution 2, which informed the Senate that the House adopted no motions to override the Governor's vetoes of HB 2002-2012 and HB 2017. (AI-written)

Appropriates money for capital improvements

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 68–69·Procedural·Sep 16, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

NoVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 139–3·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

NoVOTED

Motion: Adopt SS SCS HCS HB 1696, as amended

A yes vote adopted the Senate's version of HB 1696, which changes who is next-of-kin for the right of sepulcher and requires criminal background checks for residential camp staff and volunteers. (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 134–3·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

YesVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote ended debate on the Senate's version of HB 1696 (right of sepulcher and camp staff background checks) so the House could vote on adopting it (previous question). (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 103–40·Procedural·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2474 · MO HOUSE

Relating to design-build contracts

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 136–5·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2474 · MO HOUSE

Relating to design-build contracts

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt SCS HCS HB 2474, as amended

A yes vote adopted the Senate's version of HB 2474, which adds progressive design-build contracts to public contract law and authorizes more cooperative purchasing agreements by the state. (AI-written)

Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 131–5·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

NoVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 140–2·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

NoVOTED

Motion: Adopt SS SCS HB 2896

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 139–2·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

YesVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote ended debate on the Senate's version of HB 2896 (higher education boards and related education changes) so the House could vote on adopting it (previous question). (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 102–35·Procedural·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2292 · MO HOUSE

Relating to reporting of abuse and neglect

NoVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to abuse and neglect reporting, including a requirement to report companion animal abuse

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 128–9·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 779 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.