VOTER IDENTIFICATION (SECOND CONSIDERATION)

What it does: Approves, on second consideration, a constitutional amendment requiring voters to present specified photo ID (state, federal, tribal or college), with provisional ballots for those without it, for the April 2025 ballot. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: PASSAGE

Yes 17 · No 15 · Democrats 0–15 · Republicans 17–0

Relating to: flags flown, hung, or displayed from a flagpole or the exterior of state and local buildings and eliminating a related administrative rule.

What it does: Bars flags other than the U.S. and Wisconsin flags from state buildings, local government buildings and schools, with exceptions, and repeals an administrative rule that lets the governor direct otherwise. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: PASSAGE

Yes 50 · No 44 · Democrats 0–44 · Republicans 50–0

SUSPENSION OF RULES PROMULGATED BY STATE AGENCIES

What it does: Proposes a constitutional amendment letting the legislature suspend any state agency rule by joint resolution adopted by a majority of all members of each house, without presentment to the governor. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: ADOPTION

Yes 52 · No 45 · Democrats 0–45 · Republicans 52–0

Relating to: admission to University of Wisconsin System institutions.

What it does: Requires University of Wisconsin-Madison undergraduate admission decisions, starting 2027-28, to be predominantly based on ACT, SAT or similar test performance or objective testing measures, except for applicants admitted through the guaranteed admission program. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: PASSAGE

Yes 52 · No 45 · Democrats 0–45 · Republicans 52–0

Relating to: requiring state employees to perform their work at the offices of their employer.

What it does: On the version voted Oct 14, 2025: Requires state agencies to have employees work in person at agency offices for at least 80 percent of scheduled hours each month, exempting duties performed off site before March 2020 and the State of Wisconsin Investment Board. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: PASSAGE

Yes 51 · No 44 · Democrats 0–44 · Republicans 51–0

Relating to: prohibiting funding for health services for unlawfully present individuals.

What it does: Prohibits state, local and pass-through federal funds from paying for health care for people not lawfully present in the U.S., unless federal law requires payment or federal funds would be lost. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: PASSAGE

Yes 51 · No 44 · Democrats 0–44 · Republicans 51–0

Relating to: designating University of Wisconsin and technical college sports and athletic teams based on the sex of the participants.

What it does: As amended, requires University of Wisconsin and technical college athletic teams to be designated male, female or coed by biological sex (sex at birth per original birth certificate), bars male-sex students from female teams, and requires one-sex locker rooms, with exceptions and accommodations. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: PASSAGE

Yes 50 · No 43 · Democrats 0–43 · Republicans 50–0

Relating to: school board policies related to changing a pupil’s legal name and pronouns.

What it does: On the version voted Feb 11, 2026: Requires school boards to adopt policies to change a pupil's name or pronouns in school records only on a parent's or adult pupil's notarized request, and bar staff from using a minor's name or pronouns not matching biological sex without a parent's notarized authorization. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: PASSAGE

Yes 50 · No 43 · Democrats 0–43 · Republicans 50–0

Relating to: prohibiting gender transition medical intervention for individuals under 18 years of age.

What it does: Bans health care providers from performing or referring minors under 18 for medical treatment meant to align the body with a sex other than their biological sex, with exceptions, and requires licensing boards to revoke violators' licenses. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: PASSAGE

Yes 50 · No 43 · Democrats 0–43 · Republicans 50–0

Relating to: pay for performance grant requirements.

What it does: Requires the state to withhold 10 to 50 percent of homelessness grants for nine months, paying it only if recipients meet housing, employment or reduced-return-to-homelessness goals, and requires recipients to report data. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: PASSAGE

Yes 52 · No 46 · Democrats 0–45 · Republicans 52–1

Relating to: challenges to the validity of administrative rules and making an appropriation.

What it does: Requires a court that declares an administrative rule or guidance document invalid to award the challenging party reasonable attorney fees and costs. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: CONCURRENCE

A yes vote concurred in the Senate's SB 276, which addresses challenges to the validity of administrative rules, completing Assembly passage. (AI-written)

Yes 53 · No 45 · Democrats 0–45 · Republicans 53–0

Relating to: the expiration of administrative rules.

What it does: Makes each administrative code chapter expire on January 1 of the seventh year after it takes effect unless the agency readopts it by notice or rule; the rules committee may extend a deadline by up to one year, with a second extension for some chapters. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)

Question before the chamber: CONCURRENCE AS AMENDED

A yes vote concurred in the Senate's SB 277, which addresses the expiration of administrative rules, as amended by Assembly Substitute Amendment 3, sending it back to the Senate. (AI-written)

Yes 53 · No 45 · Democrats 0–45 · Republicans 53–0