THE RECORD, BY ISSUE

Start with what
matters to you.

Housing. Health care. Your daily commute. Find the votes behind the issues, then read what your representatives actually did. Most contested votes first. How we rank

MAKE IT LOCAL

How did your representatives vote?

Any U.S. address: Congress and state legislators, plus the NYC and D.C. councils. Governors, mayors and county officials aren't included. Recorded votes cover Congress, New York and the states on our coverage page.

No sign-up. Address lookup uses public geocoding services. The address appears in this page’s URL; remove it before sharing.

What do you want to look into?

Choose any topics · no selection shows everything

Topics use keyword matches in bill titles, available summaries and vote questions. A bill can appear in several topics; a match does not tell you whether a vote advances or opposes an issue. Use search and unclassified records to find what the tags miss.

Search titles, bill numbers, summaries & vote questionsStateChamberVote typeShowSort

Procedural votes are about scheduling, rules or whether to take up a measure, not necessarily final passage.

2,439 split votes · unanimous hidden

California AssemblyAB 1958May 28, 2026

Criminal procedure: discrimination.

What it does: Existing law prohibits the state from seeking or obtaining a criminal conviction or sentence on the basis of race, ethnicity, or national origin, as specified. Existing law allows a defendant to establish a violation of these provisions under specified circumstances, including when a longer or more severe sentence was imposed on the defendant than was imposed on other similarly situated individuals convicted of the same offense and other specified conditions are met. (official summary)

Question before the chamber: AB 1958 Kalra Assembly Third Reading

Failed 33–22Party-line

Yes 33 · No 22 · Democrats 33–2 · Republicans 0–20

Matched topics: Rights & public safetyRead the official record ↗

California AssemblyAB 1128Sep 1, 2026

Mobilehome parks: rent caps: City of Torrance.

What it does: Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, prescribes various terms and conditions of tenancies in mobilehome parks. The law defines “mobilehome park” for these purposes to mean an area of land where 2 or more mobilehome sites are rented, or held out for rent, to accommodate mobilehomes used for human habitation. The law caps the amount by which management of a qualified mobilehome park may increase the gross rental rate for a tenancy over the course of any 12-month period. (official summary)

Question before the chamber: AB 1128 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Failed 28–18Party-line

Yes 28 · No 18 · Democrats 28–2 · Republicans 0–16

Matched topics: Housing & rentRead the official record ↗

California AssemblyAB 1231Sep 13, 2025

Criminal procedure: Safer Communities Through Opportunities Act.

What it does: Existing law authorizes a judge in the superior court in which a misdemeanor is being prosecuted to offer misdemeanor diversion to a defendant. Existing law, upon successful completion of the terms, conditions, or programs ordered by the court, makes the arrest upon which the diversion was imposed deemed to have never occurred, except as specified relating to application to be a peace officer. This bill, the Safer Communities Through Opportunities Act, would authorize a court to exercise its discretion to grant pretrial diversion on a felony offense, subject to certain exceptions. (official summary)

Question before the chamber: AB 1231 ELHAWARY Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Failed 34–27Crossed party lines

Yes 34 · No 27 · Democrats 34–8 · Republicans 0–19

Matched topics: Rights & public safetyRead the official record ↗

California AssemblyAB 596Sep 13, 2025

Elections: ballot disclosures.

What it does: Under existing law, the ballot label for a statewide measure contains a condensed version of the ballot title and summary prepared by the Attorney General, including a fiscal impact summary prepared by the Legislative Analyst, followed by a listing of the names of the measure’s supporters and opponents. (official summary)

Question before the chamber: AB 596 ORTEGA Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Failed 37–22Party-line

Yes 37 · No 22 · Democrats 37–2 · Republicans 0–20

Matched topics: Rights & public safetyRead the official record ↗

California SenateAB 2575Aug 28, 2026

Health care services: artificial intelligence.

What it does: Existing law charges the Labor Commissioner with enforcement of various labor laws, including investigation of employee complaints. This bill would declare it is the policy of the state that a worker providing direct patient care be free to use their professional judgment to make assessments and decisions within their scope of practice as appropriate for their patients. The bill would prohibit an employer from retaliating or discriminating against a worker providing patient care, as specified. (official summary)

Question before the chamber: Assembly 3rd Reading AB2575 Ortega By Padilla

Failed 18–10Party-line

Yes 18 · No 10 · Democrats 18–1 · Republicans 0–9

Matched topics: Jobs & cost of living · Health & care · Technology & privacyRead the official record ↗

California AssemblyAB 2108May 27, 2026

Diversion: retail theft.

What it does: Existing law, until January 1, 2031, authorizes a city or county prosecuting attorney or county probation department to create a diversion or deferred entry of judgment program for persons who commit a theft offense or repeat theft offenses. Existing law requires the prosecuting attorney in a participating county to either refer the case to the county probation department to conduct a prefiling investigation report and determine the appropriateness of program placement or, if the prosecuting attorney’s office operates the program, determine if the case is appropriate for referral. (official summary)

Question before the chamber: AB 2108 Sharp-Collins Assembly Third Reading

Passed 41–22Party-line

Yes 41 · No 22 · Democrats 41–2 · Republicans 0–20

Matched topics: Rights & public safetyRead the official record ↗

California AssemblyAB 2257May 28, 2026

Corrections: jail administrators.

What it does: Existing law authorizes a board of supervisors of any county to, by resolution, establish a department of corrections, to be headed by an officer appointed by the board, which has jurisdiction over all county functions, personnel, and facilities, or so many as the board names in its resolution, relating to institutional punishment, care, treatment, and rehabilitation of prisoners, including, but not limited to, the county jail and industrial farms and road camps, their functions and personnel. (official summary)

Question before the chamber: AB 2257 Hart Assembly Third Reading

Passed 41–25Crossed party lines

Yes 41 · No 25 · Democrats 41–5 · Republicans 0–20

Matched topics: Rights & public safetyRead the official record ↗

California AssemblySB 274Sep 13, 2025

Automated license plate recognition systems.

What it does: Existing law prohibits a public agency, which includes the state, a city, a county, a city and county, or any agency or political subdivision of the state, a city, a county, or a city and county, including, but not limited to, a law enforcement agency, from selling, sharing, or transferring automated license plate recognition (ALPR) information, except to another public agency, and only as otherwise permitted by law. Existing law defines ALPR information as information or data collected through the use of an ALPR system. (official summary)

Question before the chamber: SB 274 Cervantes Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan

Passed 41–29Crossed party lines

Yes 41 · No 29 · Democrats 41–9 · Republicans 0–20

Matched topics: Rights & public safety · Technology & privacyRead the official record ↗

California SenateAB 2575Aug 31, 2026

Health care services: artificial intelligence.

Question before the chamber: Assembly 3rd Reading AB2575 Ortega By Padilla

Passed 21–10Party-line

Yes 21 · No 10 · Democrats 21–0 · Republicans 0–10

Matched topics: Jobs & cost of living · Health & care · Technology & privacyRead the official record ↗

California SenateSB 29Jun 4, 2025

Civil actions: decedent’s cause of action.

What it does: Existing law provides that a cause of action that survives the death of the person entitled to commence an action or proceeding passes to the decedent’s successor in interest and an action may be commenced by the decedent’s personal representative or, if none, by the decedent’s successor in interest. Existing law provides that the damages recoverable in that action or proceeding include the loss or damage that the decedent sustained or incurred before death, including any penalties or punitive or exemplary damages that the decedent would have been entitled to recover had the decedent lived. (official summary)

Question before the chamber: Senate 3rd Reading SB29 Laird

Passed 21–10Party-line

Yes 21 · No 10 · Democrats 21–0 · Republicans 0–10

Matched topics: Rights & public safetyRead the official record ↗

California AssemblyAB 2313May 28, 2026

Gas corporations: gas distribution service line replacements: alternatives.

What it does: Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including gas corporations. Existing law requires, until January 1, 2031, gas corporations to submit to the commission an annual map that includes, among other things, the location of all potential gas distribution line replacement projects identified in its distribution integrity management plan and any foreseeable gas distribution pipeline replacements. (official summary)

Question before the chamber: AB 2313 Berman Assembly Third Reading

Passed 42–21Party-line

Yes 42 · No 21 · Democrats 42–1 · Republicans 0–20

Matched topics: Climate & energyRead the official record ↗

California AssemblyAB 2564May 27, 2026

Surveillance pricing.

What it does: Existing law, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA), grants a consumer various rights with respect to personal information that is collected or sold by a business, as defined, including the right to direct a business that sells or shares personal information about the consumer to third parties not to sell or share the consumer’s personal information, as specified. (official summary)

Question before the chamber: AB 2564 Ward Assembly Third Reading

Passed 42–21Party-line

Yes 42 · No 21 · Democrats 42–1 · Republicans 0–20

Matched topics: Jobs & cost of living · Technology & privacyRead the official record ↗

Showing 12 of 2,439 matching votes · most contested first

See our data coverage →

Finding the votes…

If you entered an address, we are also checking its districts and representatives.

How did your representatives vote?

No sign-up. Address lookup uses public geocoding services. The address appears in this page’s URL; remove it before sharing.

Start with what matters to you.

How did your representatives vote?

What do you want to look into?

2,439 split votes · unanimous hidden

Finding the votes…

Start with what matters to you.

How did your representatives vote?

What do you want to look into?

2,439 split votes · unanimous hidden

Start with what
matters to you.

Start with what
matters to you.