Disability Litigation Amendments
What it does: This bill addresses website access litigation brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. This bill: provides a sunset date for statutory provisions related to abusive website access litigation; defines terms; creates a civil action for a court to determine whether a lawsuit alleging a website access violation under the Americans with Disabilities Act is abusive; and allows a court to award attorney fees and costs, punitive damages, and sanctions if the lawsuit is abusive. (official summary)
Question before the chamber: Senate/ passed 3rd reading
The tally
Yes 20 · No 6 · Not voting 3
Bar: green = yes, brown = no, striped = not voting.
| Party | Yes | No | Not voting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Republicans | 19 | 0 | 3 |
| Other or unknown party | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Most Democrats voted no; most Republicans voted yes.
The full roll (29)
Yes 20
- Ann MillnerR5
- Brady BrammerR21
- Cal MusselmanR4
- Chris WilsonR2
- Dan McCayR18
- David HinkinsR26
- Derrin OwensR27
- Don IpsonR29
- Emily BussFOR11
- Evan VickersR28
- Heidi BalderreeR22
- John JohnsonR3
- Keith GroverR23
- Keven StrattonR24
- Kirk CullimoreR19
- Lincoln FillmoreR17
- Mike McKellR25
- Ron WintertonR20
- Todd WeilerR8
- Wayne HarperR16
No 6
Not voting 3
“Not voting” is a recorded non-vote, not a reason for the absence. Parties come from public rosters; how we count.