New Hampshire SenateHB 1766
relative to cruelty to livestock.
Failed 11–13Crossed party linesClose
What it does: Sets separate rules for animal cruelty cases involving livestock: officers may confiscate livestock only when someone is charged, or its life is in imminent danger, and the investigating officer must be accompanied by the state veterinarian, a designee, or a licensed veterinarian. (AI-written summary of the bill; the official record shows the exact version voted)
Question before the chamber: VETO MESSAGE - Roll Call Required
The tally
Yes 11 · No 13 · Not voting 0
Bar: green = yes, brown = no, striped = not voting.
| Party | Yes | No | Not voting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats | 0 | 8 | 0 |
| Republicans | 11 | 5 | 0 |
Most Democrats voted no; most Republicans voted yes. 5 members voted against their party’s majority.
Voted against their party’s majority
- Bill GannonR23No
- Daryl AbbasR22No
- Denise RicciardiR9No
- Regina BirdsellR19No
- Sharon CarsonR14No
The full roll (24)
Yes 11
“Not voting” is a recorded non-vote, not a reason for the absence. Parties come from public rosters; how we count.