California SenateSB 1105
Law enforcement.
Passed 21–13Crossed party lines
What it does: Existing law defines those persons who are peace officers in the state, grants certain authority to those individuals and their employing entities, and places certain requirements on those individuals and their employing entities. (official summary)
Question before the chamber: Senate 3rd Reading SB1105 Pérez et al.
The tally
Yes 21 · No 13 · Not voting 6
Bar: green = yes, brown = no, striped = not voting.
| Party | Yes | No | Not voting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats | 21 | 4 | 5 |
| Republicans | 0 | 9 | 1 |
Most Democrats voted yes; most Republicans voted no. 4 members voted against their party’s majority.
Voted against their party’s majority
- Anna CaballeroD14No
- Catherine BlakespearD38No
- Christopher CabaldonD3No
- Tom UmbergD34No
The full roll (40)
Yes 21
- Angelique AshbyD8
- Ben AllenD24
- Caroline MenjivarD20
- Dave CorteseD15
- Eloise ReyesD29
- Jerry McNerneyD5
- Jesse ArreguínD7
- John LairdD17
- Josh BeckerD13
- Laura RichardsonD35
- Lena GonzalezD33
- Lola Smallwood-CuevasD28
- María Elena DurazoD26
- Mike McGuireD2
- Monique LimónD21
- Sasha PérezD25
- Scott WienerD11
- Steve PadillaD18
- Susan RubioD22
- Tim GraysonD9
- Former memberD
No 13
Not voting 6
“Not voting” is a recorded non-vote, not a reason for the absence. Parties come from public rosters; how we count.