California SenateAB 1201
Family reunification services.
Passed 27–10Party-line
What it does: Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child suffered or there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer serious physical harm, or a parent fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. (official summary)
Question before the chamber: Assembly 3rd Reading AB1201 Jackson
The tally
Yes 27 · No 10 · Not voting 3
Bar: green = yes, brown = no, striped = not voting.
| Party | Yes | No | Not voting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats | 27 | 0 | 3 |
| Republicans | 0 | 10 | 0 |
Most Democrats voted yes; most Republicans voted no.
The full roll (40)
Yes 27
- Akilah Weber PiersonD39
- Angelique AshbyD8
- Anna CaballeroD14
- Ben AllenD24
- Bob ArchuletaD30
- Caroline MenjivarD20
- Christopher CabaldonD3
- Dave CorteseD15
- Eloise ReyesD29
- Henry SternD27
- Jerry McNerneyD5
- Jesse ArreguínD7
- John LairdD17
- Josh BeckerD13
- Laura RichardsonD35
- Lena GonzalezD33
- Lola Smallwood-CuevasD28
- María Elena DurazoD26
- Mike McGuireD2
- Sabrina CervantesD31
- Sasha PérezD25
- Scott WienerD11
- Steve PadillaD18
- Susan RubioD22
- Tim GraysonD9
- Tom UmbergD34
- Former memberD
No 10
Not voting 3
“Not voting” is a recorded non-vote, not a reason for the absence. Parties come from public rosters; how we count.