Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Sam MartyPhoto: s3.amazonaws.com

SD · Officeholder

Sam Marty

RState Senator · District 28

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: South Dakota Senate District 28

Biography

Sam Marty (J. Sam Marty on Ballotpedia) is a Republican state senator from South Dakota's District 28 who took office on January 14, 2025, after serving in the state House from 2015 to 2023.[1] He advanced from the June 2, 2026, Republican primary, in which he defeated Ryan Maher, and is seeking re-election on November 3, 2026.[1][2]

Marty served in the U.S. Army from 1968 to 1969, and his career experience includes working as a rancher.[1] Before his election to the Senate, he represented District 28B in the South Dakota House of Representatives.[1] In the 2025-2026 session he serves on the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources and Education committees and is vice chair of the Senate Military and Veterans' Affairs Committee.[1] He won the 2026 Republican primary with 51.8% of the vote, 2,095 votes to Maher's 1,950.[1]

  1. 1.J. Sam Marty · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.South Dakota State Senate elections, 2026 · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

South Dakota Senate District 28

Sam Marty is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for South Dakota Senate District 28 as R. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Republicans voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 1 of 20 party-divided votes on file.

  • authorize the imposition of a county option gross receipts tax to reduce owner-occupied property taxes.

    What it does: On the version voted Mar 5, 2026: Allows counties, by ordinance, to impose a gross receipts tax of up to one-half percent on sales taxable under the state sales tax, with proceeds credited against county property taxe…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 0–2, Republicans 14–9

    Feb 23, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

SB 121 · SD SENATE

transfer moneys and make an appropriation for the replacement of the Richmond Lake dam and spillway and to declare an emergency.

Not votingNO VOTE

Motion: Conference Committee Report adopted

A yes vote adopted the conference committee report on SB 121, which sets the unclaimed-property transfer and the Richmond Lake dam appropriation at $8,212,497 instead of the House's $101 placeholder. (AI-written)

Transfers $8.2 million from the unclaimed property trust fund to the general fund and appropriates the same amount to replace the Richmond Lake dam and spillway.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 28–2·Substantive·Mar 30, 2026Roll call ↗
SB 78 · SD SENATE

revise the General Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2026.

NoVOTED

Motion: Do Pass Amended

On the version voted Mar 11, 2026: Changes dollar amounts in the fiscal year 2026 General Appropriations Act for operating budgets of numerous state agencies and funds.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 26–8·Substantive·Mar 12, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1326 · SD SENATE

appropriate money for the ordinary expenses of the legislative, judicial, and executive departments of the state, the current expenses of state institutions, interest on the public debt, and common schools.

NoVOTED

Motion: Do Pass

On the version voted Mar 11, 2026: Appropriates money for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2027, for the ordinary expenses of state government's legislative, judicial and executive departments, state institutions, interest on the public debt, and common schools, with amounts set by budget unit.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 25–9·Substantive·Mar 12, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1209 · SD SENATE

require employment verification eligibility through the e-verify program and to provide a penalty therefor.

YesVOTED

Motion: Reconsidered

A yes vote would reconsider the Senate's earlier vote not to adopt the conference committee report on HB 1209 (E-Verify), so the report could be voted on again. (AI-written)

On the version voted Mar 9, 2026: Requires employers with more than 50 employees to verify new hires through E-Verify within 20 days, and lets the attorney general seek a $2,000 civil penalty per violation when federal agencies confirm knowing employment of an unauthorized worker.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 15–19·Procedural·Mar 11, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1200 · SD SENATE

make an appropriation for victim services provided by nonprofit organizations.

YesVOTED

Motion: Conference Committee Report adopted

A yes vote adopted the conference committee report on HB 1200, which sets the appropriation for victim services provided by nonprofit organizations at $5,500,000, replacing the Senate version's $102 placeholder. (AI-written)

On the version voted Feb 26, 2026: Appropriates general fund money to the Department of Public Safety for grants to nonprofits assisting abused or neglected children and victims of domestic violence, sexual assault or trafficking, for services such as emergency lodging, licensed counseling, crisis lines and child advocacy centers.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 31–2·Substantive·Mar 11, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1209 · SD SENATE

require employment verification eligibility through the e-verify program and to provide a penalty therefor.

NoVOTED

Motion: Conference Committee report not adopted, no committee appointed

On the version voted Mar 9, 2026: Requires employers with more than 50 employees to verify new hires through E-Verify within 20 days, and lets the attorney general seek a $2,000 civil penalty per violation when federal agencies confirm knowing employment of an unauthorized worker.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–15·Substantive·Mar 11, 2026Roll call ↗
SB 221 · SD SENATE

regulate the retail sale of nicotine products, and to provide a penalty therefor.

YesVOTED

Motion: Concurred in amendments

A yes vote accepted the House's amendments to SB 221, which revise the retail nicotine licensing bill's fees, license transfers, and the felony convictions that bar a license, among other changes. (AI-written)

On the version voted Mar 9, 2026: Requires retail sellers of nicotine products to hold Department of Revenue licenses, with $200 or $300 application fees, and denies licenses to applicants under age 21 or with certain convictions.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 29–5·Substantive·Mar 10, 2026Roll call ↗
SB 171 · SD SENATE

amend provisions pertaining to the processing of absentee ballots and to declare an emergency.

YesVOTED

Motion: Concurred in amendments

Passed 32–2·Substantive·Mar 10, 2026Roll call ↗
SB 135 · SD SENATE

protect residents from increased utility costs and utility shortages caused by data centers and clarify authority to regulate data centers.

YesVOTED

Motion: Concurred in amendments

A yes vote accepted the House's amendment to SB 135, which narrows the data center definition to facilities with a peak demand of ten megawatts or greater and removes the sentence requiring operators to pay electricity costs. (AI-written)

On the version voted Mar 5, 2026: Requires electric providers to set separate service terms making data centers of 10 megawatts or more reimburse their attributable costs, requires water-use notices before operating, and preserves local authority to regulate data centers.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 33–1·Substantive·Mar 10, 2026Roll call ↗
SB 39 · SD SENATE

revise provisions relating to industrial hemp.

YesVOTED

Motion: Concurred in amendments

A yes vote accepted the House's amendment to SB 39, which removes the bill's definitions of "greenhouse" and "lot" and revises how the bill refers to licensed hemp producers. (AI-written)

On the version voted Mar 5, 2026: Repeals state licensing of hemp growers, researchers and processors, so that only producers licensed by the USDA or a tribal program may grow hemp in South Dakota, effective January 1, 2027.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 31–3·Substantive·Mar 10, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 99 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.