Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Ryan SpaudePhoto: s3.amazonaws.com

WI · Officeholder

Ryan Spaude

DAssembly Member · District 89

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Wisconsin Assembly District 89

Biography

Ryan Spaude is a Democratic member of the Wisconsin State Assembly who has represented District 89 since January 2025 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026, general election.[1][2] He is a prosecutor who worked in the Brown County District Attorney's Office.[1]

Ryan Spaude earned a bachelor's degree from Princeton in 2016 and a law degree from the University of Wisconsin Law School.[1] His career experience includes working as a prosecutor in the Brown County District Attorney's Office.[1]

Spaude took office on January 6, 2025, succeeding Republican Elijah Behnke in District 89, and serves on the Criminal Justice and Public Safety and Tourism committees.[1]

  1. 1.Ryan Spaude · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Wisconsin State Assembly elections, 2026 · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Wisconsin Assembly District 89

Ryan Spaude is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Wisconsin Assembly District 89 as D. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Democrats voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 16 of 203 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Education & families (5), Technology & privacy (4), Jobs & cost of living (4)

  • Relating to: changes to the educational assessment program and the school and school district accountability report.

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 10–32, Republicans 51–0

    May 13, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to: requiring the Department of Health Services to seek any necessary waiver to prohibit the purchase of candy or soft drinks with FoodShare benefits.

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 18–22, Republicans 53–0

    Feb 20, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to: social media accounts for minors and providing a penalty.

    What it does: Requires social media platforms with $1 billion or more in annual revenue to estimate users' ages, obtain parental consent for minors' accounts, default minors to private settings, and bar addictive features such as i…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 7–34, Republicans 53–1

    Feb 20, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to: app stores and app developers and providing a penalty.

    What it does: Requires app stores to verify users' age categories, link minors' accounts to a parent account, and get verifiable parental consent before a minor downloads or buys an app; sets duties for app developers; allows civil…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 5–36, Republicans 53–1

    Feb 20, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to: warning labels for explicit content, creating an explicit content label warning surcharge, making an appropriation, and providing a penalty.

    What it does: Requires distributors of explicit content on digital platforms to show a warning label covering two-thirds of the screen for at least 10 seconds or until acknowledged, and to add metadata; sets forfeitures up to $2,50…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 7–34, Republicans 54–0

    Feb 20, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

AB 1 · WI ASSEMBLY

Relating to: changes to the educational assessment program and the school and school district accountability report.

YesVOTED

Motion: PASSAGE

Passed 61–32·Substantive·May 13, 2026Roll call ↗
AB 1 · WI ASSEMBLY

Relating to: changes to the educational assessment program and the school and school district accountability report.

NoVOTED

Motion: SUSPEND RULES

Passed 53–41·Procedural·May 13, 2026Roll call ↗
AB 387 · WI ASSEMBLY

Relating to: correction bill for 2025 Wisconsin Act 15 and making an appropriation.

YesVOTED

Motion: PASSAGE

Passed 89–4·Substantive·Feb 20, 2026Roll call ↗
AB 884 · WI ASSEMBLY

Relating to: who may purchase certain contractual services and technical changes to tax provisions related to qualified retirement plans and the film production services credit.

YesVOTED

Motion: PASSAGE

Passed 88–5·Substantive·Feb 20, 2026Roll call ↗
SB 179 · WI ASSEMBLY

Relating to: applying the motor vehicle fuel tax supplier’s administrative allowance to diesel fuel, a motor vehicle fuel tax refund for evaporation losses, and making an appropriation.

NoVOTED

Motion: CONCURRENCE AS AMENDED

On the version voted Jun 18, 2025: Lets motor fuel suppliers keep the 1.35 percent administrative allowance on diesel fuel tax, as for gasoline, lets retailers claim a refund of 0.5 percent of fuel tax paid for evaporation and shrinkage, and credits wholesaler distributors for the resulting tax reduction.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 56–37·Substantive·Feb 20, 2026Roll call ↗
AB 870 · WI ASSEMBLY

Relating to: adopting changes to the federal Internal Revenue Code for state tax purposes and modifying administrative rules related to such changes.

NoVOTED

Motion: PASSAGE

Conforms Wisconsin income and franchise tax law to the federal Internal Revenue Code as of December 31, 2025, changes charging-order rules for creditors of limited liability company members, and requires local government employees who operate heavy equipment on highway improvements to hold a state license.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 58–35·Substantive·Feb 20, 2026Roll call ↗
AB 839 · WI ASSEMBLY

Relating to: allowing the Town of Three Lakes in Oneida County to create a tax incremental district in the same manner as a city or village.

YesVOTED

Motion: PASSAGE

Passed 83–10·Substantive·Feb 20, 2026Roll call ↗
SB 181 · WI ASSEMBLY

Relating to: a levy limit exemption for regional emergency medical systems and eligibility for the expenditure restraint incentive program.

YesVOTED

Motion: CONCURRENCE

Passed 92–1·Substantive·Feb 20, 2026Roll call ↗
AB 1027 · WI ASSEMBLY

Relating to: requiring information relating to the food stamp program to be compiled and provided to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

NoVOTED

Motion: PASSAGE

Changes FoodShare rules to match 2025 federal law, raising the work-requirement age cutoff from 50 to 65, narrowing the child exemption to under 14, limiting eligibility to qualified immigrants, and requiring DHS to share recipient data with USDA.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 54–39·Substantive·Feb 20, 2026Roll call ↗
AB 180 · WI ASSEMBLY

Relating to: requiring the Department of Health Services to seek any necessary waiver to prohibit the purchase of candy or soft drinks with FoodShare benefits.

YesVOTED

Motion: PASSAGE

Passed 71–22·Substantive·Feb 20, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 260 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.