Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Roland GutierrezPhoto: senate.texas.gov

TX · Officeholder

Roland Gutierrez

DState Senator · District 19

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Texas Senate District 19

Biography

Roland Gutierrez is a Democratic member of the Texas State Senate who has represented District 19 since January 2021 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election. An attorney, he previously served in the Texas House of Representatives and on the San Antonio City Council.[1]

Roland Gutierrez, an attorney, earned a J.D. from St. Mary's University School of Law and a B.A. in political science from the University of Texas at San Antonio, according to Ballotpedia.[1]

Gutierrez served on the San Antonio City Council from 2005 to 2008 and then represented District 119 in the Texas House of Representatives from 2008 to 2021.[1] He assumed office in the State Senate on January 12, 2021, and in 2023-2024 he was assigned to the Local Government, Veteran Affairs & Border Security, and Water, Agriculture, & Rural Affairs committees, as well as the Committee of the Whole Senate.[1] He advanced from the Democratic primary on March 3, 2026.[1]

  1. 1.Roland Gutierrez · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Texas Senate District 19

Roland Gutierrez is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Texas Senate District 19 as D. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Democrats voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 22 of 555 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Jobs & cost of living (7), Rights & public safety (3), Climate & energy (3)

  • Relating to a prohibition on the making and acceptance of political contributions during a special legislative session

    What it does: Bars anyone from giving political contributions to statewide officeholders, legislators or committees supporting them during a special legislative session that begins before September 1 of an odd-numbered year, and re…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 3–5, Republicans 18–1

    Aug 26, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to a prohibition on the making and acceptance of political contributions during a special legislative session

    What it does: Bars anyone from giving political contributions to statewide officeholders, legislators or committees supporting them during a special legislative session that begins before September 1 of an odd-numbered year, and re…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 3–5, Republicans 18–1

    Aug 26, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the construction of structures exceeding a certain height in certain counties containing national wildlife refuges and in adjacent counties

    What it does: Requires anyone planning a structure taller than 575 feet in certain less-populous Gulf Coast counties with national wildlife refuges, or neighboring counties, to seek state wildlife department review 90 days ahead; t…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 3–8, Republicans 19–1

    May 31, 2025Official record ↗

  • Suspending limitations on conference committee jurisdiction, H.B. No. 3556

    What it does: Lets the conference committee on a bill requiring Parks and Wildlife Department review of tall structures in counties with national wildlife refuges raise the height threshold in the bill from 500 to 575 and add rulem…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 4–7, Republicans 19–1

    May 31, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to entities that provide video services

    What it does: Excludes satellite TV and internet video streaming services from the state's definition of "video service" under cable and video franchise law, which carries local right-of-way fees, while preserving existing franchis…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 4–7, Republicans 20–0

    May 28, 2025Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 18 · TX SENATE

Relating to a restriction on the acceptance of political contributions and the making of certain political expenditures by a member of the legislature and certain political committees during certain periods in which a member is absent from a legislative session; authorizing a civil penalty

Not votingNO VOTE

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

Bars legislators who leave the state to block legislative action, and committees supporting them, from accepting contributions above a daily per diem from any one donor or spending campaign money on travel, food or lodging for the absence; violations carry civil penalties up to $5,000.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 4, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 18 · TX SENATE

Relating to a restriction on the acceptance of political contributions and the making of certain political expenditures by a member of the legislature and certain political committees during certain periods in which a member is absent from a legislative session; authorizing a civil penalty

Not votingNO VOTE

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Sep 4, 2025: Bars legislators who leave the state to block legislative action, and committees supporting them, from accepting contributions above a daily per diem from any one donor or spending campaign money on travel, food or lodging for the absence; violations carry civil penalties up to $5,000.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 7 · TX SENATE

Relating to prohibitions on the manufacture and provision of abortion-inducing drugs, including the jurisdiction of and effect of certain judgments by courts within and outside this state with respect to the manufacture and provision of those drugs, and to protections from certain counteractions under the laws of other states and jurisdictions; authorizing qui tam actions

Not votingNO VOTE

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Bans manufacturing or distributing abortion-inducing drugs in Texas, and mailing, delivering or prescribing them to or from Texas, with exceptions such as medical emergencies. Only private qui tam suits (at least $100,000 per violation) enforce it; women who take the drugs cannot be sued.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 17–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 8 · TX SENATE

Relating to the designation and use of certain spaces and facilities according to sex; authorizing a civil penalty and a private civil right of action

Not votingNO VOTE

Motion: Concur in House amendments

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Tables an amendment that would strike the bill's provisions barring courts from blocking its enforcement or certifying classes, and making parties who seek such court orders pay the other side's costs and attorney fees.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 15 · TX SENATE

Relating to certain files maintained by a law enforcement agency regarding certain employees of the agency

NoVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Requires law enforcement agencies to keep a confidential file on each officer, holding records outside the personnel file, including misconduct allegations lacking sufficient evidence. Allows review by hiring agencies, the state licensing commission, and complainants and alleged victims; bars other release.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 26–1·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 26–1·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt Floor Amendment No. 1 (Nichols)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 20–7·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 15 · TX SENATE

Relating to certain files maintained by a law enforcement agency regarding certain employees of the agency

NoVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Requires law enforcement agencies to keep a confidential file on each officer, holding records outside the personnel file, including misconduct allegations lacking sufficient evidence. Allows review by hiring agencies, the state licensing commission, and complainants and alleged victims; bars other release.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 7 · TX SENATE

Relating to prohibitions on the manufacture and provision of abortion-inducing drugs, including the jurisdiction of and effect of certain judgments by courts within and outside this state with respect to the manufacture and provision of those drugs, and to protections from certain counteractions under the laws of other states and jurisdictions; authorizing qui tam actions

NoVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Bans manufacturing or distributing abortion-inducing drugs in Texas, and mailing, delivering or prescribing them to or from Texas, with exceptions such as medical emergencies. Only private qui tam suits (at least $100,000 per violation) enforce it; women who take the drugs cannot be sued.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 17–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 1306 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.