Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Mayes MiddletonPhoto: senate.texas.gov

TX · Officeholder

Mayes Middleton

RState Senator · District 11

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Attorney General of Texas

Biography

Mayes Middleton is the Republican nominee. A Galveston oil-and-gas executive and rancher, he served in the Texas House from 2019 to 2023 and has been a state senator since 2023, chairing the Freedom Caucus. He campaigns on supporting President Trump's immigration enforcement, creating a standalone election-integrity task force and an anti-corruption team, and continuing the office's conservative litigation; the Tribune reports he has put more than $17 million of his own money into the race.[1][2][3]

Middleton is from Galveston and holds a law degree and an undergraduate degree from the University of Texas at Austin.[3] He is president and CEO of Middleton Oil Company, a family business, and also runs ranching, cattle and farming operations.[1][3]

Middleton served in the Texas House of Representatives from 2019 to 2022 and has been a member of the Texas Senate, representing District 11, since 2023.[3][1] The Texas Tribune describes him as a longtime Republican donor.[1] He is the Republican nominee for attorney general in the November 3, 2026 general election.[1][4]

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21.

On the ballot

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Republicans voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 3 of 585 party-divided votes on file.

  • Relating to the findings required to be made by the comptroller of public accounts in order to recommend for approval an application for a limitation on the taxable value of eligible property for school district maintenance and operations ad valorem tax purposes under the Texas Jobs, Energy, Technology, and Innovation Act

    What it does: Exempts electric generation facilities from the requirement that a school property tax limitation agreement under the state's business incentive program be a compelling factor in a competitive site selection decision…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 4–7, Republicans 16–4

    Apr 29, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the findings required to be made by the comptroller of public accounts in order to recommend for approval an application for a limitation on the taxable value of eligible property for school district maintenance and operations ad valorem tax purposes under the Texas Jobs, Energy, Technology, and Innovation Act

    What it does: On the version voted Apr 29, 2025: Exempts electric generation facilities from the requirement that a school property tax limitation agreement under the state's business incentive program be a compelling factor in a c…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 4–7, Republicans 16–4

    Apr 28, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to prohibiting election activities committed by a member of the board of trustees or superintendent of an independent school district or on certain school district premises; creating criminal offenses

    What it does: On the version voted Mar 31, 2025: Makes it a Class A misdemeanor for school district trustees or superintendents to use district funds or resources, like email, to electioneer, and a Class B misdemeanor for a campus…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 2–9, Republicans 19–1

    Apr 1, 2025Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 18 · TX SENATE

Relating to a restriction on the acceptance of political contributions and the making of certain political expenditures by a member of the legislature and certain political committees during certain periods in which a member is absent from a legislative session; authorizing a civil penalty

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

Bars legislators who leave the state to block legislative action, and committees supporting them, from accepting contributions above a daily per diem from any one donor or spending campaign money on travel, food or lodging for the absence; violations carry civil penalties up to $5,000.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 4, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 18 · TX SENATE

Relating to a restriction on the acceptance of political contributions and the making of certain political expenditures by a member of the legislature and certain political committees during certain periods in which a member is absent from a legislative session; authorizing a civil penalty

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Sep 4, 2025: Bars legislators who leave the state to block legislative action, and committees supporting them, from accepting contributions above a daily per diem from any one donor or spending campaign money on travel, food or lodging for the absence; violations carry civil penalties up to $5,000.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 7 · TX SENATE

Relating to prohibitions on the manufacture and provision of abortion-inducing drugs, including the jurisdiction of and effect of certain judgments by courts within and outside this state with respect to the manufacture and provision of those drugs, and to protections from certain counteractions under the laws of other states and jurisdictions; authorizing qui tam actions

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Bans manufacturing or distributing abortion-inducing drugs in Texas, and mailing, delivering or prescribing them to or from Texas, with exceptions such as medical emergencies. Only private qui tam suits (at least $100,000 per violation) enforce it; women who take the drugs cannot be sued.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 17–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 8 · TX SENATE

Relating to the designation and use of certain spaces and facilities according to sex; authorizing a civil penalty and a private civil right of action

YesVOTED

Motion: Concur in House amendments

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Tables an amendment that would strike the bill's provisions barring courts from blocking its enforcement or certifying classes, and making parties who seek such court orders pay the other side's costs and attorney fees.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 15 · TX SENATE

Relating to certain files maintained by a law enforcement agency regarding certain employees of the agency

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Requires law enforcement agencies to keep a confidential file on each officer, holding records outside the personnel file, including misconduct allegations lacking sufficient evidence. Allows review by hiring agencies, the state licensing commission, and complainants and alleged victims; bars other release.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 26–1·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 26–1·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

NoVOTED

Motion: Adopt Floor Amendment No. 1 (Nichols)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 20–7·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 15 · TX SENATE

Relating to certain files maintained by a law enforcement agency regarding certain employees of the agency

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Requires law enforcement agencies to keep a confidential file on each officer, holding records outside the personnel file, including misconduct allegations lacking sufficient evidence. Allows review by hiring agencies, the state licensing commission, and complainants and alleged victims; bars other release.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 7 · TX SENATE

Relating to prohibitions on the manufacture and provision of abortion-inducing drugs, including the jurisdiction of and effect of certain judgments by courts within and outside this state with respect to the manufacture and provision of those drugs, and to protections from certain counteractions under the laws of other states and jurisdictions; authorizing qui tam actions

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Bans manufacturing or distributing abortion-inducing drugs in Texas, and mailing, delivering or prescribing them to or from Texas, with exceptions such as medical emergencies. Only private qui tam suits (at least $100,000 per violation) enforce it; women who take the drugs cannot be sued.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 17–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 1306 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.