Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu

MO · Officeholder

Marla Smith

DState Representative · District 74

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Missouri House District 74

Biography

Marla Smith is a Democratic state representative from Missouri House of Representatives District 74, an office she has held since January 2025, and is running for re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election.[1] A lifelong Pagedale resident, she worked for decades as a senior clerk in the St. Louis County 21st Circuit Court and served as a Pagedale alderperson from 2005 to 2017.[1]

Marla Smith graduated from Normandy High School.[1] Ballotpedia says her career included nearly 30 years as a senior clerk in the St. Louis County 21st Circuit Court, and that she served as an alderperson for the city of Pagedale from 2005 to 2017.[1] In a Ballotpedia survey, she described herself as a lifelong Pagedale resident born and raised in North St. Louis County, and as a mother and grandmother.[2]

Smith assumed office on January 8, 2025, succeeding Kevin Windham Jr.[1] She defeated Maria Miller in the August 4, 2026 Democratic primary and faces Republican Jack Howard in the general election.[1] Her 2025-2026 committee assignments are the Judiciary Committee, the Ethics Committee and the Local Government Committee.[1]

In the same survey, Smith said her campaign centers on fully funded public schools, affordable healthcare, safer communities, workers' rights and respect for Missouri voters.[2] She named education and public safety as the policy areas she is most passionate about.[2]

  1. 1.Marla Smith · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Marla Smith - Candidate Connection survey · Ballotpedia Candidate's own words

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Missouri House District 74

Marla Smith is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Missouri House District 74 as D. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Democrats voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 5 of 309 party-divided votes on file.

  • Relating to daylight saving time

    What it does: Establishes the "Daylight Saving as New Standard Time Pact"

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 14–26, Republicans 93–5

    Apr 28, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to the certification of a juvenile for trial as an adult

    What it does: Modifies provisions relating to the certification of a juvenile for trial as an adult

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 5–38, Republicans 95–6

    Feb 19, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to gaming

    What it does: Modifies provisions relating to gaming

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 16–30, Republicans 67–36

    Feb 18, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to creation of a sovereign wealth fund for the state of Missouri

    A yes vote ended debate on SS SCS SJR 95, the proposed constitutional amendment creating a sovereign wealth fund, so the Missouri House could proceed to a vote on it (previous question). (AI-written)

    What it does: Submits to voters an amendment creating the Show-Me Prosperity Fund, invested in S&P 500 index funds. Once its earnings can replace the revenue, appropriations capped at 3% of its five-year average value may be used s…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 1–48, Republicans 94–0

    May 15, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to firearm suppressors

    A yes vote ended debate on HB 1730 (the previous question) so the House could vote on the bill, which ends state criminal penalties for firearm suppressors from August 28, 2026 and bars state enforcement of federal suppressor rules. (AI-written)

    What it does: Modifies provisions relating to firearm suppressors

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 1–43, Republicans 93–0

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 2017 · MO HOUSE

Appropriations bill

YesVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote would have ended debate and forced an immediate vote on House Resolution 2, which informed the Senate that the House adopted no motions to override the Governor's vetoes of HB 2002-2012 and HB 2017. (AI-written)

Appropriates money for capital improvements

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 68–69·Procedural·Sep 16, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 139–3·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt SS SCS HCS HB 1696, as amended

A yes vote adopted the Senate's version of HB 1696, which changes who is next-of-kin for the right of sepulcher and requires criminal background checks for residential camp staff and volunteers. (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 134–3·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

NoVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote ended debate on the Senate's version of HB 1696 (right of sepulcher and camp staff background checks) so the House could vote on adopting it (previous question). (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 103–40·Procedural·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2474 · MO HOUSE

Relating to design-build contracts

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 136–5·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2474 · MO HOUSE

Relating to design-build contracts

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt SCS HCS HB 2474, as amended

A yes vote adopted the Senate's version of HB 2474, which adds progressive design-build contracts to public contract law and authorizes more cooperative purchasing agreements by the state. (AI-written)

Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 131–5·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 140–2·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt SS SCS HB 2896

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 139–2·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

NoVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote ended debate on the Senate's version of HB 2896 (higher education boards and related education changes) so the House could vote on adopting it (previous question). (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 102–35·Procedural·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2292 · MO HOUSE

Relating to reporting of abuse and neglect

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to abuse and neglect reporting, including a requirement to report companion animal abuse

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 128–9·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 779 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.