Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Kris SchultzPhoto: storage.googleapis.com

NH · Officeholder

Kris Schultz

DState Representative · District Merrimack 29

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: New Hampshire House Merrimack 29

Biography

Kris Schultz is a Democratic state representative from Merrimack 29 and a member of the Concord City Council, and she is seeking re-election to the New Hampshire House in the November 3, 2026 general election.[1][2] Ballotpedia lists her profession as community organizer.[1]

Kris Schultz lives in Concord, New Hampshire, and earned a B.A. from American University in 1991.[1] Her career experience includes working as New Hampshire lead organizer with One Fair Wage, as director of communications and outreach with the New Hampshire Bible Society and the New Hampshire Council of Churches, and as a political campaign consultant.[1]

Schultz's tenure in the New Hampshire House began in 2017, according to Ballotpedia.[1] She also represents Ward 9 on the Concord City Council, where she took office on January 1, 2024, and her term there ends in 2030.[1] In the 2023-2024 session she served on the Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services Committee as clerk.[1]

  1. 1.Kris Schultz · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.New Hampshire House of Representatives elections, 2026 · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

New Hampshire House Merrimack 29

Kris Schultz is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for New Hampshire House Merrimack 29 as D. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Democrats voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 11 of 437 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Jobs & cost of living (4), Health & care (2), Transportation (2)

  • relative to the practice of optometry and authorization to perform ophthalmic laser procedures.

    What it does: Lets optometrists certified by the state optometry board perform three eye laser procedures (capsulotomy, trabeculoplasty and peripheral iridotomy) after approved training and a set number of supervised procedures, wi…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 31–122, Republicans 114–83

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

  • relative to permissible window tinting on motor vehicles.

    What it does: As introduced, allows aftermarket tinting on a vehicle's front side windows if it lets through at least 35 percent of light, and lets the state issue medical permits for similar tinting on the windshield or front side…

    Voted no · most Democrats voted yes · Democrats 149–10, Republicans 55–132

    Mar 12, 2026Official record ↗

  • relative to the practice of optometry and authorization to perform ophthalmic laser procedures.

    What it does: On the version voted Apr 9, 2026: Lets optometrists certified by the state optometry board perform three eye laser procedures (capsulotomy, trabeculoplasty and peripheral iridotomy) after approved training and a set n…

    Voted no · most Democrats voted yes · Democrats 78–76, Republicans 55–128

    Jan 7, 2026Official record ↗

  • making appropriations for capital improvements.

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 11–151, Republicans 123–81

    Apr 10, 2025Official record ↗

  • making appropriations for the expenses of certain departments of the state for fiscal years ending June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2027.

    What it does: On the version voted Jun 26, 2025: Sets the state's operating budget for fiscal years 2026 and 2027, appropriating money for state departments and agencies for July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2027 as agreed in the final…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 1–166, Republicans 191–15

    Apr 10, 2025Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 2026 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) relative to the state 10-year transportation improvement plan; relative to toll rate adjustments and periodic toll reviews for the New Hampshire turnpike system to support the 2027-2036 ten-year transportation plan; and relative to reconstruction of the Gregg Mill Road Bridge in the town of New Boston.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Passed 292–25·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 221 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) enabling electric utilities to own, operate, and offer advanced nuclear resources, and relative to purchased power agreements for electric distribution utilities and limitations on community customer generators.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Failed 152–167·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 232 · NH HOUSE

relative to the rights of conscience for medical professionals.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Requires health care institutions to notify employees who provide abortion services each year that they may request an accommodation for religious or moral objections to directly participating in abortions and may complain to the attorney general, who must report substantiated complaints annually.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 166–154·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 396 · NH HOUSE

(Second New Title) relative to the processing of cattle, swine, sheep, and goats at facilities not certified by the United States Department of Agriculture.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Failed 204–116·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1072 · NH HOUSE

relative to employer notice of department of labor investigations.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Requires the labor commissioner to give employers at least 30 days' notice before a visit or inspection and at least 30 days to answer document or interview demands, with exceptions for recent violators, imminent safety risks, likely evidence destruction, certain safety inspections and owner consent.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 160–159·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1097 · NH HOUSE

requiring legislative approval of the amendment or permanent removal of historical markers.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Failed 193–125·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1102 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) increasing the research and development tax credit cap and relative to state park fees for state residents.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Passed 231–88·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1184 · NH HOUSE

relative to the issuance of no trespass orders on municipal or school district property.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Lets public bodies issue emergency no-trespass orders for public property lasting up to 35 days, with longer orders needing a roll call vote, a one-year maximum, and a right to a hearing and appeal to superior court.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 290–29·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1267 · NH HOUSE

prohibiting school district attorneys and non-school personnel from questioning students without their parent or guardian present.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Requires school boards and charter school trustees to adopt a policy barring non-school persons, and school-employed attorneys, paralegals or law enforcement, from questioning a minor student without written parental permission, and to ask adult students whether to notify parents; child-welfare inquiries excepted.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 311–6·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1336 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) relative to regulated conditional deposits.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Lets landlords accept an extra deposit of up to one month's rent from applicants who fail disclosed screening criteria such as credit score, income, prior evictions, unpaid judgments or references, with written notice and a right to re-screening; also says advance rent need not be escrowed.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 159–155·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 571 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.