Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Justin BambergPhoto: scstatehouse.gov

SC · Officeholder

Justin Bamberg

DState Representative · District 90

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: South Carolina House District 90

Biography

Justin Bamberg is a Democratic state representative who has represented South Carolina House District 90 since 2015 and is seeking re-election on November 3, 2026.[1][2][3] An attorney with Bamberg Legal, LLC, he serves on the House Judiciary Committee and, according to Ballotpedia, is the only candidate listed in the general election for the seat.[1][2]

Justin Bamberg was born on March 7, 1987, and earned a B.A. in 2009 and a J.D. in 2011, both from the University of South Carolina, according to the House member page.[1] The page lists him as a member of the South Carolina Bar Association and its Young Lawyers Division, a board member of Healing Species, Inc. since 2009 and chairman of that board in 2014, and third vice chairman of the Bamberg County Democratic Party.[1]

Bamberg has served in the South Carolina House of Representatives since 2015.[1] Ballotpedia reports that he defeated Dan Lawrence in the 2016 election for the seat, and that the June 9, 2026 Democratic primary was canceled.[2]

  1. 1.Representative Justin T. Bamberg - Member Information · South Carolina Legislative Services Agency Official record
  2. 2.Justin Bamberg · Ballotpedia Reference
  3. 3.South Carolina House of Representatives elections, 2026 · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

South Carolina House District 90

Justin Bamberg is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for South Carolina House District 90 as D. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Democrats voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 16 of 251 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Health & care (7), Rights & public safety (7), Education & families (6)

  • Physician Noncompete Contract Prohibition

    What it does: Voids noncompete clauses in physician contracts that limit where or how long a doctor may practice or bar treating former patients, while letting employers recoup certain bonuses and relocation costs from doctors who…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 6–23, Republicans 52–30

    Mar 26, 2026Official record ↗

  • Physician Noncompete Contract Prohibition

    What it does: On the version voted Mar 26, 2026: Voids noncompete clauses in physician contracts that limit where or how long a doctor may practice or bar treating former patients, while letting employers recoup certain bonuses and…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 10–22, Republicans 55–28

    Mar 25, 2026Official record ↗

  • South Carolina Student Physical Privacy Act

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 9–19, Republicans 87–0

    Jan 29, 2026Official record ↗

  • Second Amendment Privacy Act

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 7–10, Republicans 77–0

    Apr 9, 2025Official record ↗

  • Ivermectin

    What it does: On the version voted Jun 25, 2026: Allows adults 18 and older to buy FDA-approved human-use ivermectin over the counter at pharmacies without a prescription, kept behind the counter, with Board of Pharmacy screening a…

    Voted no · most Democrats voted yes · Democrats 27–3, Republicans 16–48

    Aug 11, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

H 3305 · SC HOUSE

Supplemental Appropriations

NoVOTED

Motion: Invoke the Previous Question (Cloture)

Passed 94–18·Procedural·Aug 25, 2026Roll call ↗
H 3305 · SC HOUSE

Supplemental Appropriations

YesVOTED

Motion: Table Amendment 1A Amendment number 1A

Passed 95–17·Procedural·Aug 25, 2026Roll call ↗
H 3305 · SC HOUSE

Supplemental Appropriations

YesVOTED

Motion: Table Amendment 2A Amendment number 2A

Passed 78–21·Procedural·Aug 25, 2026Roll call ↗
H 3305 · SC HOUSE

Supplemental Appropriations

NoVOTED

Motion: Table Motion to Waive Rule 4.8

Failed 15–96·Procedural·Aug 25, 2026Roll call ↗
H 3305 · SC HOUSE

Supplemental Appropriations

YesVOTED

Motion: Waive Rule 4.8

Passed 95–15·Substantive·Aug 25, 2026Roll call ↗
H 3305 · SC HOUSE

Supplemental Appropriations

YesVOTED

Motion: Concur in Senate Amendments

Passed 96–15·Substantive·Aug 25, 2026Roll call ↗
H 5126 · SC HOUSE

Budget

YesVOTED

Motion: Proviso to 117.220

Appropriates money and provides revenues for the ordinary expenses of state government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2026, regulates how those funds are spent, and sets other provisions for operating state government that year.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 105–10·Substantive·Aug 11, 2026Roll call ↗
H 5126 · SC HOUSE

Budget

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt Conference Report

Appropriates money and provides revenues for the ordinary expenses of state government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2026, regulates how those funds are spent, and sets other provisions for operating state government that year.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 100–17·Substantive·Aug 11, 2026Roll call ↗
H 4042 · SC HOUSE

Ivermectin

NoVOTED

Motion: Table Motion to Reconsider

On the version voted Jun 25, 2026: Allows adults 18 and older to buy FDA-approved human-use ivermectin over the counter at pharmacies without a prescription, kept behind the counter, with Board of Pharmacy screening and information rules and dispensing bans when contraindications exist.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 43–51·Procedural·Aug 11, 2026Roll call ↗
H 3558 · SC HOUSE

Commissioners to Article V Convention

Not votingNO VOTE

Motion: Override Veto by the Governor

On the version voted Mar 5, 2025: Sets rules for commissioners who represent South Carolina at an Article V convention: the General Assembly names them in joint session, they must meet residency and other qualifications and take an oath, follow written instructions, and may be recalled.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 74–27·Substantive·Jun 25, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 664 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.