Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Judith ZaffiriniPhoto: senate.texas.gov

TX · Officeholder

Judith Zaffirini

DState Senator · District 21

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Texas Senate District 21

Biography

Judith Zaffirini is a Democratic member of the Texas State Senate who has represented District 21 since 1987 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election against Republican Julie Dahlberg. She holds bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees from the University of Texas at Austin and owns Zaffirini Communications.[1][2]

Zaffirini earned bachelor's, graduate and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Texas at Austin and also studied at Laredo Community College and the University of Houston, according to Ballotpedia.[1] She worked as a teacher in higher education for more than 13 years and owns her own business, Zaffirini Communications.[1] She served as vice-chair of the Texas Democratic Party from 1984 to 1986 before running for the Democratic nomination for state Senate in 1986.[1]

Zaffirini assumed office in the Texas State Senate in 1987.[1] In 2023-2024 she was assigned to the Business & Commerce, Finance, Special Committee on Redistricting and Senate State Affairs committees, as well as the Committee of the Whole Senate.[1] She defeated Cortney Jones in the March 3, 2026 Democratic primary with 73.2 percent of the vote.[1]

In a Ballotpedia survey, Zaffirini described herself as the first Mexican American woman Texas state senator and the first woman Dean of the Texas Senate, and said she has passed more than 1,500 bills.[2] She said her top priorities include education, with a focus on early and higher education, and health and human services.[2]

  1. 1.Judith Zaffirini · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Judith Zaffirini - Candidate Connection survey (2026) · Ballotpedia Candidate's own words

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Texas Senate District 21

Judith Zaffirini is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Texas Senate District 21 as D. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Democrats voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 94 of 583 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Rights & public safety (39), Education & families (30), Jobs & cost of living (17)

  • Relating to public school accountability and transparency, including the implementation of an instructionally supportive assessment program and the adoption and administration of assessment instruments in public schools, indicators of achievement, public school performance ratings, and interventions and sanctions under the public school accountability system, a grant program for school district local accountability plans, and actions challenging Texas Education Agency decisions related to public school accountability

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 3–6, Republicans 19–0

    Aug 12, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to public school accountability and transparency, including the implementation of an instructionally supportive assessment program and the adoption and administration of assessment instruments in public schools, indicators of achievement, public school performance ratings, and interventions and sanctions under the public school accountability system, a grant program for school district local accountability plans, and actions challenging Texas Education Agency decisions related to public school accountability

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 3–6, Republicans 19–0

    Aug 12, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the construction of structures exceeding a certain height in certain counties containing national wildlife refuges and in adjacent counties

    What it does: Requires anyone planning a structure taller than 575 feet in certain less-populous Gulf Coast counties with national wildlife refuges, or neighboring counties, to seek state wildlife department review 90 days ahead; t…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 3–8, Republicans 19–1

    May 31, 2025Official record ↗

  • Suspending limitations on conference committee jurisdiction, H.B. No. 3556

    What it does: Lets the conference committee on a bill requiring Parks and Wildlife Department review of tall structures in counties with national wildlife refuges raise the height threshold in the bill from 500 to 575 and add rulem…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 4–7, Republicans 19–1

    May 31, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to a school district's library materials and catalog, the establishment of local school library advisory councils, and parental rights regarding public school library catalogs and access by the parent's child to library materials

    What it does: Requires school boards to approve library book purchases and donations, bars school library materials with harmful, indecent or profane content, gives parents access to records of books their child borrows, and requir…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 3–8, Republicans 20–0

    May 31, 2025Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 18 · TX SENATE

Relating to a restriction on the acceptance of political contributions and the making of certain political expenditures by a member of the legislature and certain political committees during certain periods in which a member is absent from a legislative session; authorizing a civil penalty

NoVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

Bars legislators who leave the state to block legislative action, and committees supporting them, from accepting contributions above a daily per diem from any one donor or spending campaign money on travel, food or lodging for the absence; violations carry civil penalties up to $5,000.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 4, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 18 · TX SENATE

Relating to a restriction on the acceptance of political contributions and the making of certain political expenditures by a member of the legislature and certain political committees during certain periods in which a member is absent from a legislative session; authorizing a civil penalty

NoVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Sep 4, 2025: Bars legislators who leave the state to block legislative action, and committees supporting them, from accepting contributions above a daily per diem from any one donor or spending campaign money on travel, food or lodging for the absence; violations carry civil penalties up to $5,000.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 7 · TX SENATE

Relating to prohibitions on the manufacture and provision of abortion-inducing drugs, including the jurisdiction of and effect of certain judgments by courts within and outside this state with respect to the manufacture and provision of those drugs, and to protections from certain counteractions under the laws of other states and jurisdictions; authorizing qui tam actions

NoVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Bans manufacturing or distributing abortion-inducing drugs in Texas, and mailing, delivering or prescribing them to or from Texas, with exceptions such as medical emergencies. Only private qui tam suits (at least $100,000 per violation) enforce it; women who take the drugs cannot be sued.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 17–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 8 · TX SENATE

Relating to the designation and use of certain spaces and facilities according to sex; authorizing a civil penalty and a private civil right of action

NoVOTED

Motion: Concur in House amendments

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Tables an amendment that would strike the bill's provisions barring courts from blocking its enforcement or certifying classes, and making parties who seek such court orders pay the other side's costs and attorney fees.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 15 · TX SENATE

Relating to certain files maintained by a law enforcement agency regarding certain employees of the agency

NoVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Requires law enforcement agencies to keep a confidential file on each officer, holding records outside the personnel file, including misconduct allegations lacking sufficient evidence. Allows review by hiring agencies, the state licensing commission, and complainants and alleged victims; bars other release.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 26–1·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 26–1·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 27 · TX SENATE

Relating to a groundwater study of certain aquifers underlying the territory of the Neches and Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District by the Texas Water Development Board before the issuance of permits or permit amendments by the district

NoVOTED

Motion: Adopt Floor Amendment No. 1 (Nichols)

As amended by the Senate, requires the Texas Water Development Board to study how much groundwater can be pumped indefinitely from aquifers under the Neches and Trinity Valleys district and effects of proposed pumping and exports, reporting by January 12, 2027, without pausing new permits.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 20–7·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 15 · TX SENATE

Relating to certain files maintained by a law enforcement agency regarding certain employees of the agency

NoVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Requires law enforcement agencies to keep a confidential file on each officer, holding records outside the personnel file, including misconduct allegations lacking sufficient evidence. Allows review by hiring agencies, the state licensing commission, and complainants and alleged victims; bars other release.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 18–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 7 · TX SENATE

Relating to prohibitions on the manufacture and provision of abortion-inducing drugs, including the jurisdiction of and effect of certain judgments by courts within and outside this state with respect to the manufacture and provision of those drugs, and to protections from certain counteractions under the laws of other states and jurisdictions; authorizing qui tam actions

NoVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

On the version voted Aug 28, 2025: Bans manufacturing or distributing abortion-inducing drugs in Texas, and mailing, delivering or prescribing them to or from Texas, with exceptions such as medical emergencies. Only private qui tam suits (at least $100,000 per violation) enforce it; women who take the drugs cannot be sued.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 17–9·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 1306 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.