Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu

MO · Officeholder

Jeff Hales

DState Representative · District 86

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Missouri House District 86

Biography

Jeff Hales is a Democratic state representative from Missouri House of Representatives District 86, an office he has held since January 2025, and is running for re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election.[1] A realtor, he previously served on the University City Council representing the 1st Ward.[1]

Jeff Hales earned a bachelor's degree from Trinity College in 2000 and works as a realtor.[1] Ballotpedia says he previously served as a council member for the 1st Ward of University City.[1] In a Ballotpedia survey, he said he grew up in Clayton, has lived in University City for 23 years, and served almost seven years on its City Council.[2]

Hales assumed office on January 8, 2025, succeeding Joe Adams, and advanced from the August 4, 2026 Democratic primary.[1] His 2025-2026 committee assignments are the Financial Institutions Committee and the Local Government Committee.[1]

In the same survey, Hales listed his campaign messages as securing full funding for public schools, passing gun safety laws, and civil rights for women and the LGBTQ+ community.[2] He also said the most important area of public policy in Missouri is respecting the will of the voters.[2]

  1. 1.Jeff Hales · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Jeff Hales - Candidate Connection survey · Ballotpedia Candidate's own words

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Missouri House District 86

Jeff Hales is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Missouri House District 86 as D. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Democrats voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 5 of 313 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Climate & energy (2), Education & families (2), Rights & public safety (2)

  • Relating to prohibiting antisemitic actions that threaten students and staff at educational institutions

    What it does: Provides protections against discrimination and antisemitism in public schools and public postsecondary educational institutions

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 10–16, Republicans 90–1

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to prohibiting antisemitic actions that threaten students and staff at educational institutions

    A yes vote adopted SS HB 2061, as amended, which requires public schools and colleges to adopt a definition of antisemitism, treats antisemitic conduct like race discrimination, and has Title VI coordinators monitor complaints. (AI-written)

    What it does: Provides protections against discrimination and antisemitism in public schools and public postsecondary educational institutions

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 10–18, Republicans 91–1

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to video lottery games

    What it does: Establishes provisions relating to video lottery gaming terminals, licenses, and regulation

    Voted no · most Democrats voted yes · Democrats 28–16, Republicans 46–54

    Apr 7, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the expenditure of moneys in certain funds by the department of natural resources

    A yes vote ended debate (the previous question) so the House could vote on House Amendment 2 to SB 953, which would require community water systems to create valve and hydrant inspection programs. (AI-written)

    What it does: Changes Department of Natural Resources programs, including dropping the income-source restriction on Clean Water Commission members, giving holders of Army Corps reservoir storage rights to their return flows, and ch…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 6–36, Republicans 97–0

    May 12, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to the expenditure of moneys in certain funds by the department of natural resources

    A yes vote ended debate (the previous question) so the House could vote on an amendment to House Amendment 2 on SB 953 that adds "nonpoint sources and agricultural" wording to section 644.059. (AI-written)

    What it does: Changes Department of Natural Resources programs, including dropping the income-source restriction on Clean Water Commission members, giving holders of Army Corps reservoir storage rights to their return flows, and ch…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 18–28, Republicans 97–0

    May 12, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 2017 · MO HOUSE

Appropriations bill

YesVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote would have ended debate and forced an immediate vote on House Resolution 2, which informed the Senate that the House adopted no motions to override the Governor's vetoes of HB 2002-2012 and HB 2017. (AI-written)

Appropriates money for capital improvements

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 68–69·Procedural·Sep 16, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 139–3·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt SS SCS HCS HB 1696, as amended

A yes vote adopted the Senate's version of HB 1696, which changes who is next-of-kin for the right of sepulcher and requires criminal background checks for residential camp staff and volunteers. (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 134–3·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

NoVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote ended debate on the Senate's version of HB 1696 (right of sepulcher and camp staff background checks) so the House could vote on adopting it (previous question). (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 103–40·Procedural·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2474 · MO HOUSE

Relating to design-build contracts

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 136–5·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2474 · MO HOUSE

Relating to design-build contracts

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt SCS HCS HB 2474, as amended

A yes vote adopted the Senate's version of HB 2474, which adds progressive design-build contracts to public contract law and authorizes more cooperative purchasing agreements by the state. (AI-written)

Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 131–5·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 140–2·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt SS SCS HB 2896

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 139–2·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

NoVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote ended debate on the Senate's version of HB 2896 (higher education boards and related education changes) so the House could vote on adopting it (previous question). (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 102–35·Procedural·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2292 · MO HOUSE

Relating to reporting of abuse and neglect

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to abuse and neglect reporting, including a requirement to report companion animal abuse

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 128–9·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 779 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.