Voted against most of their party on 7 of 378 party-divided votes on file.
Most often on: Rights & public safety (6), Education & families (1), Jobs & cost of living (1)
(New Title) relative to the prohibition on teaching discrimination.
Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 0–161, Republicans 127–59
May 21, 2026Official record ↗
relative to on-premises licenses for licensed barbershops and salons.
What it does: Splits the liquor license for barbershops and salons into two tiers: a $100 license to serve one free drink per customer appointment and a $480 license to sell one drink per appointment, and requires an annual state r…
Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 40–113, Republicans 133–57
May 7, 2026Official record ↗
relative to the right to marry. Providing that the right to marry is a fundamental civil right and that the state shall protect the right of every individual, regardless of sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or race, to marry and to have their ma
What it does: As introduced, proposes a state constitutional amendment making marriage a fundamental civil right and barring the state from denying or limiting marriage based on sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or race, fo…
Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 0–156, Republicans 175–6
Mar 12, 2026Official record ↗
criminalizing and creating a private right of action for the facilitation, encouragement, offer, solicitation, or recommendation of certain acts or actions through a responsive generative communication to a child.
What it does: Makes it a crime for AI chat service operators to knowingly encourage a child toward imminent sexual conduct, illegal drug or alcohol use, self-harm, or violence, with civil liability of at least $1,000 per violation.…
Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 9–155, Republicans 192–13
Jun 5, 2025Official record ↗
relative to the assault of a firefighter, emergency medical care provider, or law enforcement officer.
What it does: Makes knowingly injuring a police officer, firefighter, or emergency medical provider on duty, or an officer targeted because of the job, first-degree assault if the injury is serious and second-degree assault otherwise.
Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 31–138, Republicans 165–39
Mar 13, 2025Official record ↗