Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Dick ThackstonPhoto: storage.googleapis.com

NH · Officeholder

Dick Thackston

RState Representative · District Cheshire 12

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: New Hampshire House Cheshire 12

Biography

Dick Thackston is a Republican state representative from Cheshire 12 who has served in the House since 2022 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election.[1][2] Thackston is a realtor and Troy selectman who has served on local and regional school boards.[1][3]

Dick Thackston was born in Morristown, New Jersey, and earned a bachelor's degree from George Mason University in 1982.[1] His career experience includes working as a realtor.[1]

In a 2024 Ballotpedia survey, Thackston described himself as a resident of Troy for more than 30 years and said he served on the Monadnock Regional School Board from 1996 to 2013, as Troy town moderator from 2014 to 2018, and as a Troy selectman from 2018.[3] He said he chaired the Monadnock Regional School Board from 2010 to 2013 and the Troy Board of Selectmen from 2018 to 2023.[3]

In the same survey, Thackston named taxation, education, rule of law and due process, parental rights, and individual liberty and responsibility as policy areas he is passionate about.[3] He wrote that local control of planning and zoning should be preserved and that market forces should primarily address housing availability.[3]

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

New Hampshire House Cheshire 12

Dick Thackston is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for New Hampshire House Cheshire 12 as R. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Republicans voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 27 of 377 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Health & care (6), Rights & public safety (5), Climate & energy (4)

  • relative to the practice of optometry and authorization to perform ophthalmic laser procedures.

    What it does: Lets optometrists certified by the state optometry board perform three eye laser procedures (capsulotomy, trabeculoplasty and peripheral iridotomy) after approved training and a set number of supervised procedures, wi…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 31–122, Republicans 114–83

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

  • establishing an employee assistance program for small town and volunteer first responders and making an appropriation therefor.

    What it does: Creates a fund run by the health department to enroll volunteer first responders, and full-time responders from towns with five or fewer paid first responders, in the state employee assistance program, and appropriate…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 160–0, Republicans 33–154

    Feb 19, 2026Official record ↗

  • limiting the authority of a municipality, county, or school district to issue bonds.

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 159–0, Republicans 75–111

    Feb 19, 2026Official record ↗

  • establishing a funding source for maintaining state owned dams.

    What it does: On the version voted Mar 26, 2026: Creates a $100 yearly fee on waterfront property, and a $50 fee on property with deeded water access, on water bodies formed by state-owned dams, with proceeds going to dam maintenan…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 159–1, Republicans 49–144

    Feb 12, 2026Official record ↗

  • prohibiting the use of federal, state, or local funds for lobbying activities.

    What it does: Bars recipients of state or local public funds from using them to lobby, letting towns and cities allow it by ballot vote, requires lobbying recipients to keep public funds physically separate, and lets towns pay Muni…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 3–157, Republicans 149–40

    Jan 8, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 2026 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) relative to the state 10-year transportation improvement plan; relative to toll rate adjustments and periodic toll reviews for the New Hampshire turnpike system to support the 2027-2036 ten-year transportation plan; and relative to reconstruction of the Gregg Mill Road Bridge in the town of New Boston.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Passed 292–25·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 221 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) enabling electric utilities to own, operate, and offer advanced nuclear resources, and relative to purchased power agreements for electric distribution utilities and limitations on community customer generators.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Failed 152–167·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 232 · NH HOUSE

relative to the rights of conscience for medical professionals.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Requires health care institutions to notify employees who provide abortion services each year that they may request an accommodation for religious or moral objections to directly participating in abortions and may complain to the attorney general, who must report substantiated complaints annually.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 166–154·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 396 · NH HOUSE

(Second New Title) relative to the processing of cattle, swine, sheep, and goats at facilities not certified by the United States Department of Agriculture.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Failed 204–116·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1072 · NH HOUSE

relative to employer notice of department of labor investigations.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Requires the labor commissioner to give employers at least 30 days' notice before a visit or inspection and at least 30 days to answer document or interview demands, with exceptions for recent violators, imminent safety risks, likely evidence destruction, certain safety inspections and owner consent.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 160–159·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1097 · NH HOUSE

requiring legislative approval of the amendment or permanent removal of historical markers.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Failed 193–125·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1102 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) increasing the research and development tax credit cap and relative to state park fees for state residents.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Passed 231–88·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1184 · NH HOUSE

relative to the issuance of no trespass orders on municipal or school district property.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Lets public bodies issue emergency no-trespass orders for public property lasting up to 35 days, with longer orders needing a roll call vote, a one-year maximum, and a right to a hearing and appeal to superior court.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 290–29·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1267 · NH HOUSE

prohibiting school district attorneys and non-school personnel from questioning students without their parent or guardian present.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Requires school boards and charter school trustees to adopt a policy barring non-school persons, and school-employed attorneys, paralegals or law enforcement, from questioning a minor student without written parental permission, and to ask adult students whether to notify parents; child-welfare inquiries excepted.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 311–6·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1336 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) relative to regulated conditional deposits.

Not votingNO VOTE

Motion: Veto Override

Lets landlords accept an extra deposit of up to one month's rent from applicants who fail disclosed screening criteria such as credit score, income, prior evictions, unpaid judgments or references, with written notice and a right to re-screening; also says advance rent need not be escrowed.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 159–155·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 571 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.