Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Dave HinmanPhoto: house.mo.gov

MO · Officeholder

Dave Hinman

RState Representative · District 103

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Missouri House District 103

Biography

Dave Hinman is a Republican state representative from O'Fallon, Missouri, who has represented House District 103 since January 2023 and is seeking re-election on November 3, 2026, against Democrat Don Crozier.[1] He is a former QuikTrip retail manager and longtime O'Fallon city official.[1]

Hinman was born in Alabama and raised in Iowa, graduated from Ankeny High School, and earned a B.S. in hotel, restaurant, and institution management from Iowa State University in 1988.[1] His career experience includes working at QuikTrip Corporation as a retail manager; in a Ballotpedia survey he said he retired after 35 years in the local customer service industry.[1][2]

Hinman served as an O'Fallon alderman and councilman, as a commissioner on the City of O'Fallon Planning and Zoning Commission, as a member of the board of directors of the O'Fallon Fire Protection District, and as president of the St. Charles County Municipal League.[1] He assumed office in the Missouri House of Representatives on January 4, 2023, succeeding John Wiemann.[1] His 2025-2026 committee assignments are Insurance, Financial Institutions, Emerging Issues, and Local Government, which he chairs.[1]

In a Ballotpedia survey, Hinman said his priorities include putting more money in residents' pockets, fully funding schools while supporting options for families, and legislation for seniors and veterans, and that he is passionate about public safety, local government, insurance and banking.[2]

  1. 1.Dave Hinman · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Dave Hinman - Candidate Connection survey (2026) · Ballotpedia Candidate's own words

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Missouri House District 103

Dave Hinman is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Missouri House District 103 as R. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Republicans voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 9 of 337 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Jobs & cost of living (4), Rights & public safety (2), Climate & energy (2)

  • Relating to the unlawful use of unmanned aircraft in certain areas

    A yes vote adopted House Amendment 21 to SB 1421, which would require courts, when imposing a death sentence, to find whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, appoint two qualified lawyers for post-conviction motions. (AI-written)

    What it does: On the version voted May 15, 2026: Makes two parts of the bill take effect immediately: authority for certified peace officers to mitigate credible drone threats, and a revised drone offense over open-air venues (now…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 0–46, Republicans 75–22

    May 5, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to county sales taxes for park purposes

    What it does: Modifies provisions governing county sales taxes for park purposes to allow tax revenues to be used for storm water management projects in parks

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 49–0, Republicans 51–52

    Apr 20, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to the attorney general

    What it does: Modifies provisions for the staffing of the attorney general's office and the capitol

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 0–42, Republicans 63–26

    Feb 25, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to gaming

    What it does: Modifies provisions relating to gaming

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 16–30, Republicans 67–36

    Feb 18, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to gaming

    What it does: Modifies provisions relating to gaming

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 7–25, Republicans 61–35

    Feb 16, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 2017 · MO HOUSE

Appropriations bill

NoVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote would have ended debate and forced an immediate vote on House Resolution 2, which informed the Senate that the House adopted no motions to override the Governor's vetoes of HB 2002-2012 and HB 2017. (AI-written)

Appropriates money for capital improvements

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 68–69·Procedural·Sep 16, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 139–3·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt SS SCS HCS HB 1696, as amended

A yes vote adopted the Senate's version of HB 1696, which changes who is next-of-kin for the right of sepulcher and requires criminal background checks for residential camp staff and volunteers. (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 134–3·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1696 · MO HOUSE

Relating to the right of sepulcher

YesVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote ended debate on the Senate's version of HB 1696 (right of sepulcher and camp staff background checks) so the House could vote on adopting it (previous question). (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the right of sepulcher

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 103–40·Procedural·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2474 · MO HOUSE

Relating to design-build contracts

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 136–5·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2474 · MO HOUSE

Relating to design-build contracts

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt SCS HCS HB 2474, as amended

A yes vote adopted the Senate's version of HB 2474, which adds progressive design-build contracts to public contract law and authorizes more cooperative purchasing agreements by the state. (AI-written)

Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 131–5·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 140–2·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt SS SCS HB 2896

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 139–2·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2896 · MO HOUSE

Relating to higher education governing bodies

YesVOTED

Motion: Previous question

A yes vote ended debate on the Senate's version of HB 2896 (higher education boards and related education changes) so the House could vote on adopting it (previous question). (AI-written)

Modifies provisions relating to the governing bodies of certain public institutions of higher education

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 102–35·Procedural·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 2292 · MO HOUSE

Relating to reporting of abuse and neglect

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (truly agreed to and finally passed)

Modifies provisions relating to abuse and neglect reporting, including a requirement to report companion animal abuse

Official summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 128–9·Substantive·May 15, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 779 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.