Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Christian ManuelPhoto: house.texas.gov

TX · Officeholder

Christian Manuel

DState Representative · District 22

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Texas House District 22

Biography

Christian Manuel is a Democratic member of the Texas House of Representatives who has represented District 22 since January 10, 2023 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election.[1][2] Ballotpedia notes he was formerly known as Christian Hayes.[1]

Christian Manuel was born in Nederland, Texas.[1] His career experience includes working for state Representative Joseph Deshotel as a case worker, district director and chief of staff.[1]

Manuel succeeded Deshotel in the Texas House, and his current term ends on January 12, 2027.[1] In 2023-2024 he was assigned to the Human Services, Elections, and Local & Consent Calendars committees.[1]

  1. 1.Christian Manuel · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Texas House of Representatives elections, 2026 · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Texas House District 22

Christian Manuel is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Texas House District 22 as D. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Democrats voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 111 of 897 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Rights & public safety (43), Jobs & cost of living (26), Education & families (24)

  • Relating to the calculation of the voter-approval tax rate for certain taxing units

    What it does: On the version voted Sep 2, 2025: Lowers from 3.5% to 2.5% the yearly growth in operating property tax revenue that cities and counties of 75,000 or more people, and certain other local taxing units, may adopt without…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 9–41, Republicans 78–3

    Aug 25, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the calculation of the voter-approval tax rate for certain taxing units

    What it does: On the version voted Sep 2, 2025: Lowers from 3.5% to 2.5% the yearly growth in operating property tax revenue that cities and counties of 75,000 or more people, and certain other local taxing units, may adopt without…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 4–49, Republicans 77–6

    Aug 25, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the calculation of the voter-approval tax rate for certain taxing units

    What it does: On the version voted Sep 2, 2025: Lowers from 3.5% to 2.5% the yearly growth in operating property tax revenue that cities and counties of 75,000 or more people, and certain other local taxing units, may adopt without…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 11–42, Republicans 83–1

    Aug 25, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the strong families credit against certain taxes for entities that contribute to certain organizations

    What it does: On the version voted May 26, 2025: Creates a franchise tax credit, capped at $5 million a year in total, for contributions to nonprofits certified by the OneStar Foundation that serve at-risk families and do not provi…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 18–30, Republicans 79–1

    May 28, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the authorized removal of certain motor vehicles

    What it does: Lets police and state license and weight inspectors remove a vehicle from a highway, or order it moved, when the driver has no valid license, is driving with a suspended license, or lacks required liability insurance.

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 25–29, Republicans 58–25

    May 28, 2025Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 1 · TX HOUSE

Relating to youth camp emergency plans and preparedness; authorizing penalties

YesVOTED

Motion: Motion: At 11:23 p.m., Representative Geren moved that, at the conclusion of the receipt of messages, the signing of bills and resolutions, and administrative

Requires licensed youth camps to adopt written emergency plans filed with the state health department, notify parents if any part of a camp is in a floodplain, give campers a safety orientation, and meet state-set minimum camper-to-counselor ratios for overnight stays.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 96–30·Procedural·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 1 · TX HOUSE

Relating to youth camp emergency plans and preparedness; authorizing penalties

YesVOTED

Motion: Concur in Senate amendments

Requires licensed youth camps to adopt written emergency plans filed with the state health department, notify parents if any part of a camp is in a floodplain, give campers a safety orientation, and meet state-set minimum camper-to-counselor ratios for overnight stays.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 122–4·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 1 · TX HOUSE

Relating to campground and youth camp safety

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

Bars licensing youth camps with floodplain cabins, with exceptions; requires campgrounds to put roof-access ladders in floodplain cabins and keep evacuation plans; requires youth camps to follow campground rules plus emergency plans, weather radios and warning systems.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 120–4·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HR 128 · TX HOUSE

Amending the House Rules of Procedure to authorize additional constitutionally compliant, proportional penalties for members absent without leave for purpose of impeding the action of the House that do not unfairly impair members' representative functions

NoVOTED

Motion: Adopt HR 128

Raises the daily fine for members absent without leave to impede the House from $500 to three times the legislative per diem; adds operating-budget forfeiture, loss of chair posts after two days and seniority cuts after three, unless the House excuses.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 80–28·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HR 174 · TX HOUSE

Suspending limitations on conference committee jurisdiction, S.B. No. 5

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt HR 174

Suspends House rules so the conference committee on Senate Bill 5 can add camp-safety funding for the Department of State Health Services, contingent on S.B. 1 ($2.59 million stabilization fund, $2.48 million general revenue), and an immediate effective date.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 127–1·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 1 · TX HOUSE

Relating to campground and youth camp safety

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

Bars licensing youth camps with floodplain cabins, with exceptions; requires campgrounds to put roof-access ladders in floodplain cabins and keep evacuation plans; requires youth camps to follow campground rules plus emergency plans, weather radios and warning systems.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 122–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 1 · TX HOUSE

Relating to campground and youth camp safety

YesVOTED

Motion: Table Amendment No. 1 (Virdell)

Bars licensing youth camps with floodplain cabins, with exceptions; requires campgrounds to put roof-access ladders in floodplain cabins and keep evacuation plans; requires youth camps to follow campground rules plus emergency plans, weather radios and warning systems.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 90–38·Procedural·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 8 · TX HOUSE

Relating to public school accountability and transparency, including the implementation of an instructionally supportive assessment program and the adoption and administration of assessment instruments in public schools, indicators of achievement, public school performance ratings, and interventions and sanctions under the public school accountability system, a grant program for school district local accountability plans, and actions challenging Texas Education Agency decisions related to public school accountability

NoVOTED

Motion: Concur in Senate amendments

Replaces STAAR testing with an instructionally supportive assessment program by 2027-2028, changes how school performance ratings are determined, and limits legal challenges to Texas Education Agency accountability decisions, including a nine-month deadline to sue over rules.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 79–47·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 8 · TX HOUSE

Relating to public school accountability and transparency, including the implementation of an instructionally supportive assessment program and the adoption and administration of assessment instruments in public schools, indicators of achievement, public school performance ratings, and interventions and sanctions under the public school accountability system, a grant program for school district local accountability plans, and actions challenging Texas Education Agency decisions related to public school accountability

YesVOTED

Motion: Extend speaking time for Rep. Hinojosa

Replaces STAAR testing with an instructionally supportive assessment program by 2027-2028, changes how school performance ratings are determined, and limits legal challenges to Texas Education Agency accountability decisions, including a nine-month deadline to sue over rules.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 86–42·Procedural·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 54 · TX HOUSE

Relating to election procedures regarding accepting a voter with a residence address that is not current and the immediate effect of a voter's registration after the registrar's receipt of certain change of address notices

Not votingNO VOTE

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

Repeals the rule that an in-county change-of-address notice takes effect immediately, and lets voters who moved within their county vote in the precinct where they are registered without having to ask the registrar to update their registration address.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 86–46·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 3159 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.