Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Ben BumgarnerPhoto: house.texas.gov

TX · Officeholder

Ben Bumgarner

RState Representative · District 63

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Texas House District 63

Biography

Ben Bumgarner is a Republican state representative from Texas House District 63 who has represented the district since 2023 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election. A firearms manufacturer, he previously served on the Flower Mound Town Council.[1][2]

Ben Bumgarner was born in Texas and lives in Flower Mound, and he graduated from McKinney High School and earned a bachelor's degree from Austin College in 2007.[1] His career experience includes working as a firearms manufacturer and owning Evolve Weapons Systems.[1] He served on the Flower Mound Town Council, including as mayor pro tem.[1]

Bumgarner took office on January 10, 2023, succeeding Tan Parker.[1] Ballotpedia lists his 2023-2024 committee assignments as Defense & Veterans' Affairs and International Relations & Economic Development.[1] In a Ballotpedia survey, he listed property tax reform, protecting Second Amendment rights and limiting government as his key messages.[3]

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Texas House District 63

Ben Bumgarner is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Texas House District 63 as R. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Republicans voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 63 of 1,005 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Jobs & cost of living (31), Education & families (12), Housing & rent (8)

  • Relating to the calculation of the voter-approval tax rate for certain taxing units

    What it does: Lowers from 3.5% to 2.5% the yearly growth in operating property tax revenue that cities and counties of 75,000 or more people, and certain other local taxing units, may adopt without voter approval, starting with 202…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 1–44, Republicans 59–27

    Sep 2, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the calculation of the voter-approval tax rate for certain taxing units

    What it does: On the version voted Sep 2, 2025: Lowers from 3.5% to 2.5% the yearly growth in operating property tax revenue that cities and counties of 75,000 or more people, and certain other local taxing units, may adopt without…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 2–48, Republicans 76–4

    Aug 25, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the calculation of the voter-approval tax rate for certain taxing units

    What it does: On the version voted Sep 2, 2025: Lowers from 3.5% to 2.5% the yearly growth in operating property tax revenue that cities and counties of 75,000 or more people, and certain other local taxing units, may adopt without…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 4–49, Republicans 77–6

    Aug 25, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the integration of early voting by personal appearance and election day voting, including the manner in which election returns are processed and other related changes

    What it does: Shortens early voting to start 12 days before an election and run through the day before Election Day, makes early voting sites Election Day polling places, and counts in-person early ballots with Election Day ballots…

    Voted no · most Republicans voted yes · Democrats 23–25, Republicans 61–20

    Jun 1, 2025Official record ↗

  • Relating to the authority of certain municipalities to use certain tax revenue for certain qualified projects

    What it does: Lets certain cities designate a hotel-tax project financing zone as a continuous area with exact boundaries, no larger than the three-mile-radius maximum, if designated by December 31, 2024, and adds one city over 250…

    Voted yes · most Republicans voted no · Democrats 53–1, Republicans 29–54

    May 28, 2025Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 1 · TX HOUSE

Relating to youth camp emergency plans and preparedness; authorizing penalties

NoVOTED

Motion: Motion: At 11:23 p.m., Representative Geren moved that, at the conclusion of the receipt of messages, the signing of bills and resolutions, and administrative

Requires licensed youth camps to adopt written emergency plans filed with the state health department, notify parents if any part of a camp is in a floodplain, give campers a safety orientation, and meet state-set minimum camper-to-counselor ratios for overnight stays.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 96–30·Procedural·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 1 · TX HOUSE

Relating to youth camp emergency plans and preparedness; authorizing penalties

YesVOTED

Motion: Concur in Senate amendments

Requires licensed youth camps to adopt written emergency plans filed with the state health department, notify parents if any part of a camp is in a floodplain, give campers a safety orientation, and meet state-set minimum camper-to-counselor ratios for overnight stays.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 122–4·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 1 · TX HOUSE

Relating to campground and youth camp safety

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

Bars licensing youth camps with floodplain cabins, with exceptions; requires campgrounds to put roof-access ladders in floodplain cabins and keep evacuation plans; requires youth camps to follow campground rules plus emergency plans, weather radios and warning systems.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 120–4·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HR 128 · TX HOUSE

Amending the House Rules of Procedure to authorize additional constitutionally compliant, proportional penalties for members absent without leave for purpose of impeding the action of the House that do not unfairly impair members' representative functions

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt HR 128

Raises the daily fine for members absent without leave to impede the House from $500 to three times the legislative per diem; adds operating-budget forfeiture, loss of chair posts after two days and seniority cuts after three, unless the House excuses.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 80–28·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HR 174 · TX HOUSE

Suspending limitations on conference committee jurisdiction, S.B. No. 5

YesVOTED

Motion: Adopt HR 174

Suspends House rules so the conference committee on Senate Bill 5 can add camp-safety funding for the Department of State Health Services, contingent on S.B. 1 ($2.59 million stabilization fund, $2.48 million general revenue), and an immediate effective date.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 127–1·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 1 · TX HOUSE

Relating to campground and youth camp safety

YesVOTED

Motion: Passage to third reading (second reading)

Bars licensing youth camps with floodplain cabins, with exceptions; requires campgrounds to put roof-access ladders in floodplain cabins and keep evacuation plans; requires youth camps to follow campground rules plus emergency plans, weather radios and warning systems.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 122–8·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 1 · TX HOUSE

Relating to campground and youth camp safety

YesVOTED

Motion: Table Amendment No. 1 (Virdell)

Bars licensing youth camps with floodplain cabins, with exceptions; requires campgrounds to put roof-access ladders in floodplain cabins and keep evacuation plans; requires youth camps to follow campground rules plus emergency plans, weather radios and warning systems.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 90–38·Procedural·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 8 · TX HOUSE

Relating to public school accountability and transparency, including the implementation of an instructionally supportive assessment program and the adoption and administration of assessment instruments in public schools, indicators of achievement, public school performance ratings, and interventions and sanctions under the public school accountability system, a grant program for school district local accountability plans, and actions challenging Texas Education Agency decisions related to public school accountability

YesVOTED

Motion: Concur in Senate amendments

Replaces STAAR testing with an instructionally supportive assessment program by 2027-2028, changes how school performance ratings are determined, and limits legal challenges to Texas Education Agency accountability decisions, including a nine-month deadline to sue over rules.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 79–47·Substantive·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
HB 8 · TX HOUSE

Relating to public school accountability and transparency, including the implementation of an instructionally supportive assessment program and the adoption and administration of assessment instruments in public schools, indicators of achievement, public school performance ratings, and interventions and sanctions under the public school accountability system, a grant program for school district local accountability plans, and actions challenging Texas Education Agency decisions related to public school accountability

NoVOTED

Motion: Extend speaking time for Rep. Hinojosa

Replaces STAAR testing with an instructionally supportive assessment program by 2027-2028, changes how school performance ratings are determined, and limits legal challenges to Texas Education Agency accountability decisions, including a nine-month deadline to sue over rules.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 86–42·Procedural·Sep 3, 2025Roll call ↗
SB 54 · TX HOUSE

Relating to election procedures regarding accepting a voter with a residence address that is not current and the immediate effect of a voter's registration after the registrar's receipt of certain change of address notices

YesVOTED

Motion: Final passage (third reading)

Repeals the rule that an in-county change-of-address notice takes effect immediately, and lets voters who moved within their county vote in the precinct where they are registered without having to ask the registrar to update their registration address.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 86–46·Substantive·Sep 2, 2025Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 3186 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.