Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Austin BaethPhoto: legis.iowa.gov

IA · Officeholder

Austin Baeth

DState Representative · District 36

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: Iowa House District 36

Biography

Austin Baeth is a Democratic state representative who has represented Iowa House District 36 since 2023 and is seeking re-election in the November 3, 2026 general election.[1][2] Ballotpedia lists Baeth's career experience as a physician.[1]

Austin Baeth was born in Des Moines, Iowa, according to Ballotpedia.[1] Baeth earned a bachelor's degree from the University of Iowa in 2007, a doctorate in medicine from the University of Iowa in 2012, and a graduate degree from the University of Colorado in 2015.[1] In the 2025-2026 session Baeth was assigned to the Economic Growth, House Government Oversight, House Human Resources, House Ways and Means and Health Policy Oversight committees.[1]

  1. 1.Austin Baeth · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.Iowa House of Representatives elections, 2026 · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

Iowa House District 36

Austin Baeth is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for Iowa House District 36 as D. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Other candidates for this seat

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Democrats voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 16 of 300 party-divided votes on file.

Most often on: Rights & public safety (8), Jobs & cost of living (4), Education & families (3)

  • Prohibiting warrant resolution clinics, including enforcement mechanisms, providing penalties, and including effective date provisions

    What it does: On the version voted May 2, 2026: Prohibits warrant resolution clinics, events letting people with outstanding warrants resolve them without immediate arrest. Makes knowing violations simple misdemeanors, adds removal…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 8–20, Republicans 63–0

    Apr 29, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to state regulatory compliance and eligibility requirements, including by modifying provisions related to the verification of the identity and employment eligibility of individuals by the board of educational examiners, school districts, accredited nonpublic schools, charter schools, and innovation zone schools; the provision of a false social security number to an employer, prospective employer, or a potential employee; qualifications for employment, professional licensure, voter re...

    What it does: Requires state agencies, schools, universities, cities and counties to use E-Verify for new hires, bars professional licenses for people not verified as lawfully present, fines employers $10,000 for knowingly employin…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 10–18, Republicans 61–2

    Apr 29, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to state regulatory compliance and eligibility requirements, including by modifying provisions related to the verification of the identity and employment eligibility of individuals by the board of educational examiners, school districts, accredited nonpublic schools, charter schools, and innovation zone schools; the provision of a false social security number to an employer, prospective employer, or a potential employee; qualifications for employment, professional licensure, voter re...

    What it does: On the version voted Apr 29, 2026: Requires state agencies, schools, universities, cities and counties to use E-Verify for new hires, bars professional licenses for people not verified as lawfully present, fines emplo…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 13–16, Republicans 65–0

    Mar 17, 2026Official record ↗

  • Designating kratom as a schedule I controlled substance, and making penalties applicable

    What it does: Adds kratom, including its plant parts, synthetic equivalents and compounds such as mitragynine, to the state's list of schedule I controlled substances, making possession a serious misdemeanor for a first offense, wi…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 11–19, Republicans 58–7

    Mar 17, 2026Official record ↗

  • Relating to interpretation of law in administrative and judicial proceedings under the Iowa administrative procedure Act

    What it does: Requires courts and administrative judges to interpret laws and rules on their own, without deferring to a state agency's interpretation, and to resolve remaining doubt in favor of limiting the agency's authority; lic…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 11–19, Republicans 65–0

    Mar 17, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HF 2801 · IA HOUSE

Modifying the major economic growth attraction program, and including effective date provisions

YesVOTED

Motion: Shall the bill pass?

Lets the state award one business a tax credit of up to 10% of its investment, paid over ten years, for a major project in a county of 50,000 people or fewer, instead of up to 5% credits for two businesses; credits are refundable and transferable.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 75–17·Substantive·Oct 2, 2026Roll call ↗
SF 2472 · IA HOUSE

Relating to state and local government taxes, fees, financial authority, and budgets, by modifying property assessment provisions, divisions of revenue, and funding from the secure an advanced vision for education fund, establishing a program for first-time homebuyers, modifying and making appropriations, and including effective date, applicability, and retroactive applicability provisions

NoVOTED

Motion: Shall the bill pass?

On the version voted May 3, 2026: Replaces most homeowners' homestead property tax credit with an exemption of 10% of taxable value, from $5,500 to $20,000, starting in 2026, limits county and city general levies and other rate-limited levies to 2% yearly growth, and creates FirstHome Iowa savings accounts.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 62–22·Substantive·May 2, 2026Roll call ↗
HF 2800 · IA HOUSE

Relating to state and local government and finances, including by making, modifying, limiting, or reducing appropriations, distributions, or transfers, authorizing expenditure of unappropriated moneys in special funds, making corrections, and providing for properly related matters including the national electrical code, local civil rights laws, political party state central committees, noxious weeds, nonresident deer hunting licenses, proprietary treatment systems, poultry associations, tax c...

NoVOTED

Motion: Shall the bill pass?

On the version voted May 3, 2026: Makes wide-ranging changes to state law and budgets, including corrections to 2026 acts, limits on standing appropriations, an insurer tax credit for health care access, a civil litigation abuse lawsuit, required American history and government courses at state universities, and judicial salary changes.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 58–26·Substantive·May 2, 2026Roll call ↗
HF 2800 · IA HOUSE

Relating to state government and finances, including by making corrections, and including effective date and retroactive applicability provisions

YesVOTED

Motion: Shall amendment H–8494, to amendment H–8491, be adopted?

Amends the bill to remove its division that changes the 2023 National Electrical Code for Iowa homes (such as dropping arc-fault interrupter requirements) and bars local electrical codes stricter than the national code. (AI-written)

On the version voted May 3, 2026: Makes wide-ranging changes to state law and budgets, including corrections to 2026 acts, limits on standing appropriations, an insurer tax credit for health care access, a civil litigation abuse lawsuit, required American history and government courses at state universities, and judicial salary changes.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 28–56·Substantive·May 2, 2026Roll call ↗
SJR 11 · IA HOUSE

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to requirements for certain state tax law changes

YesVOTED

Motion: Shall amendment H–8490 be adopted?

On the version voted Apr 15, 2025: Proposes a state constitutional amendment requiring a two-thirds vote of each legislative chamber to raise income tax rates or create a new state income-based tax; it goes to voters in November 2026.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 21–57·Substantive·May 2, 2026Roll call ↗
SJR 11 · IA HOUSE

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to requirements for certain state tax law changes

YesVOTED

Motion: Shall the rules be suspended to consider amendment H–8488?

On the version voted Apr 15, 2025: Proposes a state constitutional amendment requiring a two-thirds vote of each legislative chamber to raise income tax rates or create a new state income-based tax; it goes to voters in November 2026.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 21–57·Procedural·May 2, 2026Roll call ↗
SJR 11 · IA HOUSE

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to requirements for certain state tax law changes

YesVOTED

Motion: Shall amendment H–8487 be adopted?

On the version voted Apr 15, 2025: Proposes a state constitutional amendment requiring a two-thirds vote of each legislative chamber to raise income tax rates or create a new state income-based tax; it goes to voters in November 2026.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 21–57·Substantive·May 2, 2026Roll call ↗
SJR 11 · IA HOUSE

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to requirements for certain state tax law changes

YesVOTED

Motion: Shall the rules be suspended to consider amendment H–8486?

On the version voted Apr 15, 2025: Proposes a state constitutional amendment requiring a two-thirds vote of each legislative chamber to raise income tax rates or create a new state income-based tax; it goes to voters in November 2026.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 22–56·Procedural·May 2, 2026Roll call ↗
SJR 11 · IA HOUSE

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to requirements for certain state tax law changes

YesVOTED

Motion: Shall the rules be suspended to consider amendment H–8485?

On the version voted Apr 15, 2025: Proposes a state constitutional amendment requiring a two-thirds vote of each legislative chamber to raise income tax rates or create a new state income-based tax; it goes to voters in November 2026.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 21–57·Procedural·May 2, 2026Roll call ↗
SJR 11 · IA HOUSE

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to requirements for certain state tax law changes

YesVOTED

Motion: Shall the rules be suspended to consider amendment H–8484?

On the version voted Apr 15, 2025: Proposes a state constitutional amendment requiring a two-thirds vote of each legislative chamber to raise income tax rates or create a new state income-based tax; it goes to voters in November 2026.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 21–57·Procedural·May 2, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 531 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.