Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu
Portrait of Alexis SimpsonPhoto: storage.googleapis.com

NH · Officeholder

Alexis Simpson

DState Representative · District Rockingham 33

On the ballot Nov 3, 2026: New Hampshire House Rockingham 33

Biography

Alexis Simpson is the incumbent Democratic candidate for the New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 33, in the November 3, 2026 general election. Ballotpedia lists her as minority leader of the House since 2025 and as a minister by profession.[1][2]

Simpson lives in Exeter, New Hampshire.[1] She earned a B.S. in physics from the University of Virginia, a master's degree in divinity from Emory University in 2000, and a master's degree in theology from Harvard University in 2020.[1] Her career experience includes working as the executive director of The Waysmeet Center, the bridge pastor of the First Congregational Church in Hancock, New Hampshire, and the interfaith coordinator with Phillips Exeter Academy.[1] She previously served in the House from 2014 to 2016 representing Rockingham 18, and Ballotpedia lists her tenure in the current seat as beginning in 2020.[1] Simpson began serving as minority leader of the House in 2025.[1]

  1. 1.Alexis Simpson · Ballotpedia Reference
  2. 2.New Hampshire House of Representatives elections, 2026 · Ballotpedia Reference

Researched from the cited sources on 2026-10-21. Not yet independently fact-checked.

New Hampshire House Rockingham 33

Alexis Simpson is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot for New Hampshire House Rockingham 33 as D. Not researched in depth — candidate list only.

Ballotpedia ↗

Votes by issue

Their recorded votes on bills that divided the chamber (unanimous votes left out), grouped by topic. A bill can sit under more than one topic. "With" and "against" compare each vote with how most Democrats voted. How topics are assigned

Where they stood out

Voted against most of their party on 5 of 512 party-divided votes on file.

  • requiring legislative approval of the amendment or permanent removal of historical markers.

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 23–119, Republicans 169–6

    Aug 19, 2026Official record ↗

  • relative to the practice of optometry and authorization to perform ophthalmic laser procedures.

    What it does: Lets optometrists certified by the state optometry board perform three eye laser procedures (capsulotomy, trabeculoplasty and peripheral iridotomy) after approved training and a set number of supervised procedures, wi…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 31–122, Republicans 114–83

    Apr 9, 2026Official record ↗

  • relative to the practice of optometry and authorization to perform ophthalmic laser procedures.

    What it does: On the version voted Apr 9, 2026: Lets optometrists certified by the state optometry board perform three eye laser procedures (capsulotomy, trabeculoplasty and peripheral iridotomy) after approved training and a set n…

    Voted no · most Democrats voted yes · Democrats 78–76, Republicans 55–128

    Jan 7, 2026Official record ↗

  • relative to the practice of optometry and authorization to perform ophthalmic laser procedures.

    What it does: On the version voted Apr 9, 2026: Lets optometrists certified by the state optometry board perform three eye laser procedures (capsulotomy, trabeculoplasty and peripheral iridotomy) after approved training and a set n…

    Voted yes · most Democrats voted no · Democrats 61–92, Republicans 132–50

    Jan 7, 2026Official record ↗

  • relative to creating a state assessment on non-homestead luxury second homes to fund statewide housing development programs and address housing shortages and making appropriations therefor.

    What it does: As introduced, creates a twice-yearly state charge on homes valued over $1 million that are not a primary residence, at $2.50 per $500 of value above $1 million, to fund housing programs. Appropriates money for housin…

    Voted no · most Democrats voted yes · Democrats 100–50, Republicans 0–184

    Mar 11, 2026Official record ↗

How this is counted

Their votes on the most contested roll calls

The votes in their chamber that came out closest and most divided by party, among those they voted on. How we rank

See all their split votes

Substantive votes concern legislation or nominations; procedural votes concern how the chamber considers them. A Yes vote applies to the motion shown, which may not be final passage.

HB 2026 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) relative to the state 10-year transportation improvement plan; relative to toll rate adjustments and periodic toll reviews for the New Hampshire turnpike system to support the 2027-2036 ten-year transportation plan; and relative to reconstruction of the Gregg Mill Road Bridge in the town of New Boston.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Passed 292–25·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 221 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) enabling electric utilities to own, operate, and offer advanced nuclear resources, and relative to purchased power agreements for electric distribution utilities and limitations on community customer generators.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Failed 152–167·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 232 · NH HOUSE

relative to the rights of conscience for medical professionals.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Requires health care institutions to notify employees who provide abortion services each year that they may request an accommodation for religious or moral objections to directly participating in abortions and may complain to the attorney general, who must report substantiated complaints annually.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 166–154·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 396 · NH HOUSE

(Second New Title) relative to the processing of cattle, swine, sheep, and goats at facilities not certified by the United States Department of Agriculture.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Failed 204–116·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1072 · NH HOUSE

relative to employer notice of department of labor investigations.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Requires the labor commissioner to give employers at least 30 days' notice before a visit or inspection and at least 30 days to answer document or interview demands, with exceptions for recent violators, imminent safety risks, likely evidence destruction, certain safety inspections and owner consent.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 160–159·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1097 · NH HOUSE

requiring legislative approval of the amendment or permanent removal of historical markers.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Failed 193–125·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1102 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) increasing the research and development tax credit cap and relative to state park fees for state residents.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Passed 231–88·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1184 · NH HOUSE

relative to the issuance of no trespass orders on municipal or school district property.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Lets public bodies issue emergency no-trespass orders for public property lasting up to 35 days, with longer orders needing a roll call vote, a one-year maximum, and a right to a hearing and appeal to superior court.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 290–29·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1267 · NH HOUSE

prohibiting school district attorneys and non-school personnel from questioning students without their parent or guardian present.

YesVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Requires school boards and charter school trustees to adopt a policy barring non-school persons, and school-employed attorneys, paralegals or law enforcement, from questioning a minor student without written parental permission, and to ask adult students whether to notify parents; child-welfare inquiries excepted.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Passed 311–6·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗
HB 1336 · NH HOUSE

(New Title) relative to regulated conditional deposits.

NoVOTED

Motion: Veto Override

Lets landlords accept an extra deposit of up to one month's rent from applicants who fail disclosed screening criteria such as credit score, income, prior evictions, unpaid judgments or references, with written notice and a right to re-screening; also says advance rent need not be escrowed.

AI summary — read the bill text ↗
Failed 159–155·Substantive·Aug 19, 2026Roll call ↗

Showing 10 of 571 votes in this collection. Coverage may be incomplete; each entry links to the official record.