Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu

Proposal 3: Declaration of Rights; Right to Collectively Bargain

Statewide — all of Vermont

General election · Tuesday, November 3, 2026

  • Placed on the ballot by the Legislature: VTDigger reports that Proposal 3 was approved by the Legislature in both the 2024 and 2025 sessions, as Vermont requires of constitutional amendments before they go to voters, and that 15 House members voted against it in 2025. The legislature's bill-status page records the proposal as delivered to the Secretary of State on June 3, 2026.[2][3]

The question on the ballot

To see if the voters will amend the Vermont Constitution by adding Article 23 to read: Article 23. [Right to collectively bargain] That employees have a right to organize or join a labor organization for the purpose of collectively bargaining with their employer through an exclusive representative of their choosing for the purpose of negotiating wages, hours, and working conditions and to protect their economic welfare and safety in the workplace. Therefore, no law shall be adopted that interferes with, negates, or diminishes the right of employees to collectively bargain with respect to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment and workplace safety, or that prohibits the application or execution of an agreement between an employer and a labor organization representing the employer’s employees that requires membership in the labor organization as a condition of employment.[4]

Proposal 3 would add Article 23 to Chapter I of the Vermont Constitution. It would state that employees have a right to organize or join a labor organization to bargain collectively with their employer through an exclusive representative of their choosing over wages, hours and working conditions, and that no law may interfere with, negate or diminish that right or prohibit agreements between an employer and a union that require union membership as a condition of employment. If ratified it takes effect on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November 2026. No fiscal note was found in the sources reviewed.[1][3]

A YES vote means

A yes vote would add the right to collectively bargain to the Vermont Constitution.

A NO vote means

A no vote would leave the Vermont Constitution without this provision.

Arguments made for

  • Rep. Conor Casey (D-Montpelier), who is running a "Yes on 3" campaign, said, according to VTDigger: "It certainly belongs in our constitution."[3]
  • Larry Moquin, president of the Vermont AFL-CIO, said, according to VTDigger: "I think that the workers in the state deserve it,"[3]

Arguments made against

  • Clara Morrison of the Right for Vermont Foundation said, according to VTDigger: "What this amendment actually does is prevent workers’ from gaining the freedom to choose whether to join or fund a private union without risking their job,"[3]
  • Rep. Lisa Hango (R-Berkshire), who voted against the measure in 2025, said, according to VTDigger: "I simply do not support taking away a worker’s freedom to decide."[3]

On record in support

  • Yes on 3 campaign (run by Rep. Conor Casey, D-Montpelier, who described it to VTDigger as a 'one-man shop').[3]
  • Vermont AFL-CIO (president Larry Moquin, who has pushed for a version of the amendment since 2022).[3]

On record in opposition

  • Right for Vermont Foundation (president Clara Morrison, in an email to VTDigger).[3]
  • Rep. Lisa Hango (R-Berkshire), one of 15 House members who voted against the measure in 2025.[3]

Research notes & limits

The ballot question is the wording printed on the Town of Eden's official sample ballot for the Nov. 3, 2026 'Official State Constitutional Amendment Ballot' (the Secretary of State's site was not used for the wording). Governor Scott's July 27, 2026 proclamation of Proposal 3 carries the same article text. The legislature's 'as adopted by the Senate' PDF contains both the 2023 version (which also had a dues clause) and the later adopted version; the summary follows the adopted text in the ballot and proclamation. Vermont publishes no voter-pamphlet arguments; the arguments are statements quoted by VTDigger. The Legislature's roll-call tallies were not independently checked beyond VTDigger's report. No fiscal note was found. Current law, fiscal impact and campaign-finance totals were not found in an official or mainstream source: no legislative fiscal note or official analysis located, and VTDigger describes the Yes on 3 campaign as a one-person effort with no registered opposition committee identified.

Sources · 4

Researched 2026-10-19. Green citations are official government records.