Constitutional Amendment 3: Crime Victims' Rights (Marsy's Law)
Statewide — all of Tennessee
General election · Tuesday, November 3, 2026
- Legislatively referred constitutional amendment, proposed as HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 94 (113th) & SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 9 (114th). Ballotpedia News reports the final votes on SJR 9 were 27-5 in the Senate (March 3, 2025) and 93-0 in the House (April 21, 2025). WPLN News describes it as a Tennessee version of Marsy's Law and notes Tennessee added eight victims' rights by a 1998 amendment vote. To pass, an amendment must receive more yes than no votes and a number of yes votes greater than one-half of all votes cast for governor, so a ballot that leaves the question blank does not count toward passage.[1][2][3]
The question on the ballot
Shall Article I, Section 35 of the Constitution of Tennessee be amended by deleting the section in its entirety and substituting the following: Section 35. That to preserve and protect the rights of victims of crime to justice and due process throughout the criminal and juvenile justice systems, a victim, as defined by law and which may be expanded by the General Assembly, shall have the following rights, which shall be protected: (1) The right to be treated with fairness for the victim's safety and dignity; (2) The right, upon request, to reasonable notice of all public criminal proceedings and all public juvenile delinquency proceedings involving the accused; (3) The right to be present at all public criminal proceedings and all public juvenile delinquency proceedings involving the accused; (4) The right upon request to be heard in any proceeding involving release, plea, sentencing, disposition, and parole, as well as any public proceeding when relevant during which a right of the victim is implicated; (5) The right to be heard and informed of all parole procedures, to participate in the parole process, to provide information to the parole authority to be considered before the parole of the offender, and to be notified, upon request, of the parole or other release of the offender; (6) The right to be free from harassment, intimidation, and abuse throughout the criminal justice system, including reasonable protection, as defined by the General Assembly, from the accused or any person acting on behalf of the accused; (7) The right, upon request, to reasonable notice of any release, transfer, or escape of the accused or convicted person; (8) The right to full and timely restitution from the offender; (9) The right to a speedy trial or disposition and a prompt and final conclusion of the case after the conviction or sentence; (10) The right to be informed of the minimum sentence the offender will serve in custody and the scheduled release date; (11) The right to have the safety of the victim, the victim's family, and the general public considered before any parole or other post-judgment release decision is made; (12) The right, upon request, to confer with the prosecution; and (13) The right to be fully informed of all rights afforded to crime victims. A victim may assert the rights enumerated in this section, not as a party, but in the manner further provided by the General Assembly protecting the victim's right to standing. The General Assembly has the authority to enact substantive and procedural laws to further define, implement, preserve, and protect the rights guaranteed to victims by this section. This section must be interpreted to preserve and protect the rights of all persons to due process. This section, or any law enacted under this section, does not create a basis for vacating a conviction. This section does not restrict the powers of the District Attorney General or the inherent authority of the court. Other than as provided in the preceding paragraph, this section does not create a cause of action or claim for damages against the state or a political subdivision of the state; an officer, employee, or agent of the state or of any of its political subdivisions; or an officer or employee of the court.[1]
Attorney General's summary (as posted by the Secretary of State): This amendment changes Article I, section 35 of the Tennessee Constitution by clarifying existing rights for crime victims and adding new rights. The amendment gives victims new rights: to fair treatment; to be informed about and participate in the parole process; to be protected from harassment, intimidation, and abuse; to be informed of the minimum sentence the convicted criminal will serve, as well as their scheduled release date; and to have their safety, their family’s safety, and the public’s safety taken into account before any decision is made to release the convicted criminal. The amendment also maintains or clarifies victims’ existing rights: to be informed about legal proceedings involving the accused or convicted criminal; to be present at public criminal proceedings; to be informed of any release, transfer, or escape of the accused or convicted criminal; to talk to prosecutors; to make statements about conviction, sentencing, or release of the accused person; to a speedy resolution of the case; to restitution from the convicted criminal; and to be informed of their rights. The amendment does not restrict the powers of prosecutors or courts and does not create a cause of action or claim for damages against the State of Tennessee. WPLN News reports the amendment comprises 13 rights and extends the scope of victims to those affected by juvenile offenders, and that it does not contain the Florida-style language preventing disclosure of victims' records or information. Tennessee Lookout and WPLN describe a few Democratic lawmakers questioning the cost to courts. The Fiscal Review Committee fiscal note estimates only a one-time $9,400 local cost to publish the sample ballot.[1][3][5]
A YES vote means
Replaces Article I, Section 35 with a longer list of 13 victims' rights, including new rights to be informed of and participate in the parole process, to be told the minimum sentence and scheduled release date, and to have victim and public safety considered before release decisions; the amendment states it does not restrict prosecutors' or courts' powers or create a claim for damages against the state. (Secretary of State: a yes vote adopts the language in the proposed amendment.)
A NO vote means
Keeps the current Article I, Section 35 language unchanged. (Secretary of State: a no vote keeps the current language in the Constitution.)
The law today
Article I, Section 35 now lists eight crime victims' rights added by a 1998 amendment vote, including the right to confer with prosecutors, to be free from harassment and intimidation, and to be informed of all proceedings and of the release of the accused or convicted person, according to WPLN News. Tennessee statutes also provide victims' rights such as notice of bail hearings and dismissals.[3]
Official fiscal estimate
Fiscal Review Committee fiscal note (Jan. 16, 2025): the only estimated impact is a one-time, mandatory local government expenditure of $9,400 in FY26-27 to publish the longer sample ballot, based on the Secretary of State's recent publication costs. The note estimates no other costs. WPLN News reports a few Democratic lawmakers questioned how the state would cover additional costs to courts.[6][3]
Arguments made for
- Sen. John Stevens (R-Huntingdon), a co-sponsor, said in 2024 that the 1998 victims' rights amendment "has been demonstrably inadequate, unenforceable and in practice, mainly aspirational," and that the new amendment will give victims "meaningful and enforceable constitutional rights and protections," per WPLN News.[3]
- Bonnie Brezina, who leads the Marsy's Law for Tennessee initiative, said: "Crime victims in Tennessee are overdue on some serious, serious changes."[3]
Arguments made against
- Sen. Sara Kyle (D-Memphis) said during the 2024 debate: "We can make the statute even stronger as time goes by." WPLN News also quotes her as saying: "Should we need to once again come back and change the Constitution, that takes time."[3]
- The ACLU of Tennessee, which opposes Amendment 3, says: "Tennessee should support people harmed by crime, but it should not do so by weakening the constitutional rights that protect every one of us from unfair treatment by the government."[4]
On record in support
Research notes & limits
Question text and Attorney General summary verbatim from the Tennessee Secretary of State's page (the full proposed text is long; the ballot question reproduces it). Vote counts are from Ballotpedia News (reference). Arguments are attributed statements quoted by WPLN News and the ACLU of Tennessee's own page; Sen. Stevens's two quoted phrases are fragments from separate sentences in the source and are presented as quoted fragments, not as one sentence. No campaign finance totals were found for either side.
Sources · 6
Researched 2026-10-19. Green citations are official government records.
- 1.2026 Proposed Constitutional Amendments (Attorney General summaries and ballot questions) · Tennessee Secretary of State Official record
- 2.Tennessee legislators advance constitutional amendments on crime victims' rights, bail, and property taxes to 2026 ballot · Ballotpedia News · 2025-04-24 Reference
- 3.Tennessee Amendment 3 gives voters say on Marsy's Law and expanded crime victim rights · WPLN News · 2026-10-13 News report
- 4.What's on the ballot in Tennessee? · ACLU of Tennessee · 2026-10-05 Candidate's own words
- 5.Voters face three constitutional questions in November election · WPLN News / Tennessee Lookout · 2026-06-03 News report
- 6.Fiscal Note, SJR 9 (crime victims' rights amendment) · Tennessee General Assembly Fiscal Review Committee · 2025-01-16 Official record