Constitutional Amendment 1: Bail
Statewide — all of Tennessee
General election · Tuesday, November 3, 2026
- Legislatively referred constitutional amendment, proposed as SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 919 (113th) & SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 25 (114th). Tennessee requires passage in two consecutive General Assemblies. Ballotpedia News reports the April 2025 final votes on SJR 25 were 23-6 in the Senate (March 17, 2025) and 84-10 in the House (April 21, 2025). To pass, an amendment must receive more yes than no votes and a number of yes votes greater than one-half of all votes cast for governor, so a ballot that leaves the question blank does not count toward passage.[1][2]
The question on the ballot
Shall Article I, Section 15 of the Constitution of Tennessee be amended by deleting the following: That all prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offences, when the proof is evident, or the presumption great. And the privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of rebellion or invasion, the General Assembly shall declare the public safety requires it. and substituting instead the following: (a) All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties unless for the following when the proof is evident or the presumption great: (1) A capital offense; (2) An act of terrorism; (3) Second degree murder; (4) Aggravated rape of a child; (5) Aggravated rape; (6) Grave torture; and (7) Any other offense for which, as of November 3, 2026, a defendant, if convicted, could not be released prior to the expiration of at least eighty-five percent of the entire sentence imposed. (b) In any case in which bail for an offense listed in subsection (a) is granted or denied before conviction, the judge or magistrate shall place in the record the judge's or magistrate's reasons for granting or denying bail. (c) The privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of rebellion or invasion, the General Assembly shall declare the public safety requires it.[1]
Attorney General's summary (as posted by the Secretary of State): This amendment changes Article I, section 15 of the Tennessee Constitution by allowing a court to hold a defendant without bail before trial when that defendant is accused of: an offense punishable by the death penalty, an act of terrorism, second degree murder, aggravated rape of a child, aggravated rape, grave torture, or any crime for which a convicted person would be required to serve eighty-five percent of their sentence. This amendment requires courts to state on the record the reasons for their decision to grant or deny bail in those cases. WPLN News reports the fiscal note attached to the 2025 legislation gave an estimate of nearly $10,000 for publishing the ballot and did not include estimates of any additional incarceration or court expenses; WPLN also reports the ballot lists six offenses by name while the wider "85 percent" category covers dozens more that are not listed on the ballot. Currently, per the Tennessee Lookout, capital offenses are the only offenses for which defendants have no right to bail.[1][3][5]
A YES vote means
Amends Article I, Section 15 so that a court may deny pretrial bail, when the proof is evident or the presumption great, for a capital offense, an act of terrorism, second degree murder, aggravated rape of a child, aggravated rape, grave torture, or any other offense for which a convicted defendant could not be released before serving at least 85 percent of the sentence, and requires the judge to state reasons on the record when bail is granted or denied for those offenses. (Secretary of State: a yes vote adopts the language in the proposed amendment.)
A NO vote means
Keeps the current Article I, Section 15 language unchanged. (Secretary of State: a no vote keeps the current language in the Constitution.)
The law today
Article I, Section 15 now provides that all prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offences, when the proof is evident, or the presumption great. WPLN News reports judges can currently deny bail only for capital offenses.[1][3]
Official fiscal estimate
Fiscal Review Committee fiscal note (Jan. 18, 2025): the only estimated impact is a one-time, mandatory local government expenditure of $9,400 in FY26-27 to publish the longer sample ballot, based on the Secretary of State's recent publication costs. The note estimates no other costs. WPLN News notes the note does not estimate any additional incarceration or court costs.[6][3]
Arguments made for
- Sen. Jack Johnson (R-Franklin), who co-sponsored the resolution with House Speaker Cameron Sexton, said: "We need to empower our judges to deny bail when they believe that someone is a genuine threat to society," per WPLN News.[3]
- Johnson also argued, per WPLN News, that wealth should not determine release: "[Judges] can make that bail very high, but now you’ve given an opportunity for someone who has access to significant resources to get out of jail," he said, adding: "Someone who doesn’t is going to remain in jail."[3]
Arguments made against
- Sen. Jeff Yarbro (D-Nashville) said during the 2025 legislative session: "This is not a narrow change." WPLN News reports he also said it "adds 73 or so offenses to a list."[3]
- The ACLU of Tennessee, which opposes Amendment 1, says: "The amendment would give the government more power to jail people accused of certain crimes who have not been convicted."[4]
On record in support
- Sen. Jack Johnson (R-Franklin), who co-sponsored the resolution, and House Speaker Cameron Sexton (R-Crossville), who sponsored it.[3][5]
- Tennessee Sheriffs' Association and Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference, which WPLN News reports support the amendment according to Sen. Johnson's office.[3]
On record in opposition
- ACLU of Tennessee, which states on its website that it opposes Amendment 1.[4]
- Tennessee Association of Professional Bail Agents, whose president Shelly Alexander said "We are completely opposed," per the Tennessee Lookout; the Lookout reported the group was preparing a campaign against it.[5]
- Sen. Jeff Yarbro (D-Nashville) and Rep. Justin Pearson (D-Memphis), who raised objections to the resolution during legislative debate, per WPLN News.[3]
Research notes & limits
Ballot question text and Attorney General summary are verbatim from the Tennessee Secretary of State's page (sos.tn.gov), which presents them as the amendment will appear on the ballot. Vote counts come from Ballotpedia News (reference) rather than the legislature's roll-call pages, which were not retrieved. Arguments are attributed legislator and advocacy-group statements from WPLN News and the ACLU of Tennessee's own page; no registered campaign committee in favor was identified (Tennessee Lookout reported no organized campaign for or against Amendment 1 as of June 2026, though a bail-agents association said it was 'completely opposed'). No campaign finance totals were found for either side.
Sources · 6
Researched 2026-10-19. Green citations are official government records.
- 1.2026 Proposed Constitutional Amendments (Attorney General summaries and ballot questions) · Tennessee Secretary of State Official record
- 2.Tennessee legislators advance constitutional amendments on crime victims' rights, bail, and property taxes to 2026 ballot · Ballotpedia News · 2025-04-24 Reference
- 3.Tennessee Amendment 1 asks voters to change bail rules · WPLN News · 2026-10-12 News report
- 4.What's on the ballot in Tennessee? · ACLU of Tennessee · 2026-10-05 Candidate's own words
- 5.Voters face three constitutional questions in November election · WPLN News / Tennessee Lookout · 2026-06-03 News report
- 6.Fiscal Note, SJR 25 (bail amendment) · Tennessee General Assembly Fiscal Review Committee · 2025-01-18 Official record