Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu

Constitutional Amendment to Keep the State Income Tax Rate from Being Raised Higher than 3.5%

Statewide — all of North Carolina

General election · Tuesday, November 3, 2026

  • Referred to the ballot by the General Assembly as Senate Bill 1080 (Session Law 2026-4), ratified May 21, 2026; primary sponsors are Sens. Michael Lee (R-New Hanover), Benton Sawrey and Lisa Barnes. The third-reading roll calls were 30-18 in the Senate and 73-46 in the House. Carolina Journal reported the amendment is part of the state budget framework agreement announced by Senate leader Phil Berger. Voters approved a 2018 amendment lowering the cap from 10% to 7%.[1][6][7][3][8]

The question on the ballot

[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST Constitutional amendment to keep the State income tax rate from being raised higher than three and one-half percent (3.5%).[1]

The amendment would amend Article V, Section 2(6) of the North Carolina Constitution to lower the maximum rate of tax on incomes from 7 percent to 3.5 percent. If approved it would take effect upon certification and apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027. Raising the rate above 3.5 percent would then require another constitutional amendment. WUNC reported that the current state budget already schedules the rate to fall from 3.99% to 3.49% in 2027; the amendment would make a cap permanent in the Constitution. The session law contains no fiscal estimate.[1][5]

A YES vote means

Lowers the maximum state income tax rate allowed by the Constitution from 7% to 3.5%, so the rate could not be raised above 3.5% without another amendment.

A NO vote means

Leaves the constitutional maximum income tax rate at 7%.

The law today

Article V, Section 2(6) of the North Carolina Constitution currently provides that the rate of tax on incomes shall not in any case exceed seven percent; the session law rewrites that limit to three and one-half percent. Under S.L. 2023-134 the personal income tax rate was cut to 3.99% in 2026, with further half-point cuts triggered by General Fund revenue thresholds; the Fiscal Research Division's May 2026 forecast anticipates 3.49% in 2027 and 2.99% in 2028 and after.[1][9]

Official fiscal estimate

The General Assembly's Fiscal Research Division (May 19, 2026 fiscal note on S.B. 1080) estimated no fiscal impact, because the personal income tax rate is expected to be below the maximum allowable rate under existing revenue triggers, the statutory corporate income tax rate is and will be below the maximum, and election costs are anticipated to be minimal.[9]

Read the full text of the measure ↗

Arguments made for

  • Sen. Michael Lee (R-New Hanover) said in a statement to WECT: "Our tax reforms have produced more than a decade of strong revenue growth while letting people keep more of what they earn, and this amendment locks in that progress. I'm encouraging North Carolinians to vote yes in November. This is their decision to make, and it's a chance to put a real, lasting protection in the constitution for every taxpayer in the state."[2]
  • Sen. Ralph Hise (R-Mitchell) said in a May committee meeting: “I fundamentally disagree with the state concept of an income tax.”[10]

Arguments made against

  • Gov. Josh Stein (D) called the amendment, at a May 27, 2026 press conference, "a con, a cynical shell game and a millionaire protection cap," and said: "We have to have a balanced budget every year when revenues are needed. You know who's going to have to pay? It's you. Regular people every time they go buy something through the sales tax."[3]
  • The NC Budget & Tax Center said: "Income tax limits don't impact the total state and local taxes paid by North Carolinians. A limit on the income tax rate won't keep total state and local taxes low. In reality, states with income tax limits or no income tax tend to rely more on sales taxes, property taxes, and fees to fund the programs and services that are necessary to move our communities forward."[4]

On record in support

  • Sen. Michael Lee (R-New Hanover), a primary sponsor, said he is encouraging North Carolinians to vote yes.[2]

On record in opposition

  • Gov. Josh Stein (D) criticized the amendment at a May 27, 2026 press conference.[3]
  • NC Budget & Tax Center published an analysis critical of the amendment.[4]
  • NC By the People, a ballot referendum committee of 20 organizations, is campaigning against all three amendments, including this one.[11]
  • North Carolina Association of Educators, a coalition member, was quoted in the coalition's release saying the amendments would drain billions from schools.[11]

Research notes & limits

Ballot question text is taken verbatim from the question set out in the ratified session law, which is the text the State Board of Elections is directed to use on ballots. The North Carolina State Board of Elections' certified list could not be loaded (its pages list no ballot-question text); the three statewide amendments rest on the session laws and WUNC's September 22, 2026 explainer, which says voters will decide three proposed amendments, and the question wording is taken from the session laws. North Carolina has no citizen initiative and publishes no voter-pamphlet arguments; arguments are attributed quotes from news reports. A simple majority of votes cast on the question approves each amendment. Lee's and Stein's statements are as quoted in the cited reports; the NC Budget & Tax Center is an advocacy research group and is quoted as an organization's stated position. Supporters and opponents are limited to those whose stance a fetched page shows. No campaign-finance totals for the ballot-measure committees were found, so campaignFinance is omitted.

Sources · 11

Researched 2026-10-19. Green citations are official government records.

  1. 1.Session Law 2026-4 (Senate Bill 1080), ratified May 21, 2026 · North Carolina General Assembly · 2026-05-21 Official record
  2. 2.Should North Carolina have income, property tax limits? You'll decide on the ballot · WECT · 2026-05-26 News report
  3. 3.Stein warns against lowering NC constitutional tax cap · Carolina Journal · 2026-05-27 News report
  4. 4.Senate Bill 1080: Lower Taxes for All NC · NC Budget & Tax Center News report
  5. 5.Explainer: The constitutional amendments on the 2026 ballot · WUNC · 2026-09-22 News report
  6. 6.Senate roll call #535, SB 1080 third reading · North Carolina General Assembly Official record
  7. 7.House roll call #664, SB 1080 third reading · North Carolina General Assembly Official record
  8. 8.Senate Bill 1080 (Session Law 2026-4), bill history · North Carolina General Assembly Official record
  9. 9.Legislative Fiscal Note, Senate Bill 1080 (First Edition) · North Carolina General Assembly, Fiscal Research Division · 2026-05-19 Official record
  10. 10.State income tax cap (2026 NC voter guide) · NC Newsline News report
  11. 11.NC By the People launches statewide campaign focused against constitutional amendments · Democracy North Carolina Reference