Amendment 1: Budget Stabilization Fund
Statewide — all of Florida
General election · Tuesday, November 3, 2026
- Placed on the ballot by the Florida Legislature as House Joint Resolution 5019 (2025), which passed the House 100-1 and the Senate 29-4 on June 16, 2025 (Florida Senate vote history). The Division of Elections database lists it as ballot number 1. Florida has no role for the governor in referring amendments, and amendments need 60 percent voter approval.[4][2]
The question on the ballot
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, ARTICLE III, SECTION 19. BUDGET STABILIZATION FUND.—Proposing an amendment to the State Constitution to increase the amount of funds that may be retained in the budget stabilization fund from 10% to 25% of general revenue collections, require the legislature to transfer the lesser of $750 million or the amount required to reach 25% of the general revenue collections each year unless certain conditions are met, and allow the legislature to withdraw funds for critical state needs.[1][2]
The amendment would amend Article III, Section 19 of the Florida Constitution to raise the cap on the Budget Stabilization Fund (the state's rainy-day reserve) from 10 percent to 25 percent of general revenue collections, and to require the Legislature each year to transfer the lesser of $750 million or the amount needed to reach the 25 percent cap, unless the fund was drawn on for shortfalls or emergencies or the Legislature suspends the transfer for a critical need that exceeds it, which requires a two-thirds vote of each house in a separate bill and may not occur more than once every five years. News Service of Florida, citing a House staff analysis, reported the fund is capped at about $4.75 billion in the then-current fiscal year at the 10 percent level. The House final bill analysis says the fiscal impact on the state is indeterminate but likely insignificant.[1][3][6]
A YES vote means
Raises the maximum balance of the state's Budget Stabilization Fund from 10% to 25% of general revenue, requires an annual transfer of up to $750 million into it (with exceptions), and lets the Legislature withdraw funds for critical state needs.
A NO vote means
Keeps the 10% cap on the Budget Stabilization Fund and the current rules, with no constitutional requirement for an annual transfer.
The law today
The Budget Stabilization Fund was created in 1992. Under Article III, Section 19(g) of the Florida Constitution, it must retain at least 5 percent and may not exceed 10 percent of the last completed fiscal year's net General Revenue collections; funds may be withdrawn only to cover General Revenue shortfalls or to provide funding for an emergency as defined by general law, and general law must provide for restoring the fund (Florida House final bill analysis).[6]
Official fiscal estimate
The House final bill analysis (nonpartisan staff) says: "The fiscal impact on the state is indeterminate but likely insignificant."[6]
Arguments made for
- Senate President Ben Albritton (R-Wauchula) said the proposal "makes Florida's balance sheet more durable in difficult times, and we're setting more money aside to have its rainy-day reserves if things get difficult."[3]
- House Speaker Daniel Perez (R-Miami) said: "After this bill passes, we will be in a better place, God forbid, there is a recession and, of course, there is a possibility of a recession." He added: "But what we do know is if we are in that position, God forbid, one day, the state of Florida will be prepared."[3]
Arguments made against
- Rich Templin, lobbyist for the Florida AFL-CIO, told the House Budget Committee: "We have so many needs and obligations that are still unmet. Why would we take money and put it in our retirement account?" Opponents in the committee hearing said lawmakers should instead use the money to address needs such as raising teacher pay and providing health care to children.[3]
- Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) wrote on X: "This is a foolish constitutional amendment proposal. We already have a maxed out rainy day fund and have run the largest surpluses in state history," and "I recommend a NO vote."[5]
On record in support
- Republican Party of Florida: officially endorsed Amendment 1; Chairman Evan Power said it "keeps Florida prepared for storms, emergencies, and downturns without raising taxes."[5][7]
- Senate President Ben Albritton and House Speaker Daniel Perez (at the time of passage): legislative leaders who backed the measure.[3][5]
- David Jolly, the Democratic nominee for governor: says he supports it, with an emphasis on guardrails on the money (per WLRN, citing Florida Politics).[7]
On record in opposition
- Gov. Ron DeSantis (R): "I recommend a NO vote."[5]
- U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds, the Republican nominee for governor: opposes it, according to a campaign spokesperson.[7]
- Florida AFL-CIO: lobbyist Rich Templin criticized the proposal at a House Budget Committee hearing.[3]
- Miami-Dade Democratic Party and Palm Beach County Democratic Party: recommend a no vote.[7]
Research notes & limits
The Division of Elections' Initiatives / Amendments / Revisions Database (constitutionalinitiatives.dos.fl.gov) lists exactly three proposed amendments with 2026 ballot numbers 1-3 (all legislative referrals), and the Flagler County Supervisor of Elections' 2026 General Election page also lists three; the Department of State reports that none of the citizen-initiative petitions qualified. Florida requires 60 percent of votes cast. Florida publishes no voter-pamphlet arguments, so arguments are attributed quotes from news reports or official statements. No registered campaign committees were located for Amendments 1 and 2. The Division of Elections database gives the title and summary text but not the 'CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, ARTICLE III, SECTION 19' heading; that heading is from the enrolled resolution's ballot statement. Committee votes (House Budget 23-4, Senate Appropriations 14-3) are in the cited News Service of Florida report. Gov. DeSantis's opposition (posted Sept. 14, 2026) puts him at odds with the Republican Party of Florida, which endorsed the amendment (per WUSF). Enrichment (Oct. 19): current-law and fiscal text are from the House final bill analysis (nonpartisan staff); no Revenue Estimating Conference dollar estimate exists for this measure in the sources reviewed. WLRN's description says the current Constitution requires a $750 million annual transfer; the House analysis shows that requirement is part of the amendment, not current law, so WLRN's sentence was not used. No registered campaign committees or finance filings were found for this measure.
Sources · 7
Researched 2026-10-19. Green citations are official government records.
- 1.HJR 5019 (2025), enrolled: Budget Stabilization Fund · Florida Legislature · 2025-06-16 Official record
- 2.Initiatives / Amendments / Revisions Database: Budget Stabilization Fund (Amendment 1) · Florida Department of State, Division of Elections Official record
- 3.Florida lawmakers want to pump up rainy-day fund with constitutional amendment · News Service of Florida via WKMG · 2025-06-05 News report
- 4.HJR 5019 (2025) bill history and vote history · Florida Senate · 2025-06-17 Official record
- 5.DeSantis splits with state GOP on reserve fund amendment · WUSF · 2026-09-15 News report
- 6.HJR 5019 final bill analysis (Budget Stabilization Fund) · Florida House of Representatives (nonpartisan staff) · 2025-08-15 Official record
- 7.What Florida voters need to know about Amendments 1 and 2 · WUSF / WLRN · 2026-10-15 News report