Skip to main content
The Full Record
Menu

Proposition 144: Voter Identification, Citizenship Voting and Election Administration

Statewide — all of Arizona

General election · Tuesday, November 3, 2026

  • Referred to the ballot by the Arizona Legislature as House Concurrent Resolution 2001 (2026). It passed the House 32-27 on Feb. 9, 2026, passed the Senate 16-12 on June 12, 2026, and passed the House again 31-23 on June 12, 2026, per Arizona Legislature floor-vote records.[3]
  • Per Ballotpedia, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled on July 27, 2026 that the measure does not violate the separate-vote requirement.[4]

The question on the ballot

PROPOSITION 144. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION BY THE LEGISLATURE RELATING TO ELECTION REQUIREMENTS. OFFICIAL TITLE: AMENDING ARTICLE VII, CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA, BY ADDING SECTION 19. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE: REQUIRES ALL VOTERS, INCLUDING VOTERS WHO VOTE BY MAIL, TO SHOW GOVERNMENT-ISSUED ID TO VOTE IN EACH ELECTION; MAKES OTHER CHANGES TO ELECTION ADMINISTRATION AND CAMPAIGN FINANCE PROHIBITIONS.[2]

Amends the Arizona Constitution to: reaffirm that only U.S. citizens may register and vote; require voters to present valid government-issued proof of identity before casting a ballot in each election, as prescribed by law; require that voters be given the option to have ballots tabulated at their voting location on election day; prohibit foreign nationals from contributing or spending to influence an Arizona election and anyone from accepting such a contribution; allow the people and the legislature to enact election laws, including on early and mail voting, if rationally connected to a legitimate state interest (the ballot summary says this creates a new standard for judicial review of election laws, which may make it harder to challenge election laws); require the legislature to appropriate funds to implement it; and apply it to elections on or after January 1, 2028. It is titled the Fast Accurate Secure Transparent Election Results Act.[1][2]

A YES vote means

A "yes" vote shall have the effect of amending the Arizona Constitution to: (1) require voters to show proof of identity when voting in each election, including when voting by mail; (2) changing existing proof of identity requirements to limit acceptable documentation to government-issued ID; (3) require election officials to provide all voters the option to have their ballot tabulated at their voting location on election day; (4) prohibit foreign nationals from contributing or spending to influence elections in Arizona and prohibit anyone from knowingly accepting such contributions, similar to prohibitions that already exist in federal law; (5) create a new standard for judicial review of election laws under the Arizona Constitution, which may make it harder to challenge election laws; and (6) require the legislature to appropriate money necessary to implement these provisions.

A NO vote means

A "no" vote shall have the effect of maintaining current constitutional provisions governing elections.

Arguments made for

  • AZ Free Enterprise Club (Scot Mussi, President): "Proposition 144 boils down to: Only citizens registering and voting in our elections, all voters providing government issued identification prior to voting in each election, no foreign money in our elections, and ensuring every voter in every county has the option of tabulating their own ballot on election day at the voting location."[2]
  • Heritage Action for America (Nathan Duell, Arizona State Director): "Prop 144 strengthens voter ID provisions, ensures only American citizens vote in Arizona, and accelerates election results reporting by giving voters the option to have their ballot tabulated when cast at their voting location."[2]

Arguments made against

  • Arizona Public Health Association (Will Humble, Executive Director): "Proposition 144 replaces our current system (that works) with a bunch of bureaucratic red tape, especially for people who vote by mail."[2]
  • ACLU of Arizona (Darrell Hill, Director of Policy): "Prop 144 would narrow the list of acceptable voter ID, meaning voters could not use a utility bill, bank statement, or insurance card to cast their ballot thus reducing access particularly for rural voters, young people, low-income or other marginalized people."[2]

On record in support

  • State Rep. Alexander Kolodin signed or sponsored an argument for Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]
  • Yavapai County Republican Committee (County Chair Kristin Baumgartner) signed or sponsored an argument for Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]
  • Heritage Action for America (Arizona State Director Nathan Duell) signed or sponsored an argument for Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]
  • Arizona Free Enterprise Club (President Scot Mussi) signed or sponsored an argument for Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]
  • Arizona Women of Action (President Kimberly Miller) signed or sponsored an argument for Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]
  • State Sen. Shawnna Bolick signed or sponsored an argument for Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]

On record in opposition

  • Arizona Public Health Association (Executive Director Will Humble) signed or sponsored an argument against Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]
  • Lumen Strategies (staff Isabel Caputi, Christopher Gilfillan and Xitlali Landry) signed or sponsored an argument against Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]
  • Civic Engagement Beyond Voting (Co-Directors Melinda Iyer and Catherine Sigmon) signed or sponsored an argument against Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]
  • Vitalyst Health Foundation (President and CEO Roy Pringle) signed or sponsored an argument against Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]
  • League of Women Voters of Arizona (Pinny Sheoran) signed or sponsored an argument against Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]
  • Changing Hands Bookstore co-founders Gayle Shanks and Clive Sommer, Tempe signed or sponsored an argument against Proposition 144 printed in the official publicity pamphlet.[2]

Research notes & limits

Slate: the Secretary of State's official 2026 General Election Publicity Pamphlet (hosted by the Citizens Clean Elections Commission; azsos.gov itself returned a bot-protection block and was not bypassed) lists exactly eight statewide measures: Propositions 141, 142, 144, 316, 317, 318, 319 and 320. Ballot question, 'yes'/'no' text: copied from the pamphlet's 'Ballot Format' page for this proposition. Arguments: excerpts of arguments published in that pamphlet, attributed to the signer and sponsoring organization it prints; the pamphlet prints many arguments per side (it reproduces spelling and punctuation as submitted), so these are a selection of 2 for and 2 against, not the full set. Legislative vote counts are from the Arizona Legislature's floor-action records. The pamphlet contains no fiscal estimate for this measure. Required vote: a majority of those voting. Items attributed to Ballotpedia (court ruling or campaign details) were not independently confirmed from the underlying primary source. Supporters and opponents listed are organizations and officials that signed or sponsored arguments printed in the official publicity pamphlet (taken in the pamphlet's print order, counting each organization or official once and skipping arguments signed only by private individuals with no organization or office; capped at the first six per side, the same way on both sides, and a side with fewer than six lists every such organization or official the pamphlet prints); signing or sponsoring an argument is taken as the stance. No committee finance totals were found (seethemoney.az.gov is a script-driven portal and no reputable report of totals was located), and the pamphlet and Legislative Council analysis contain no fiscal estimate or current-law description beyond the yes/no text.

Sources · 4

Researched 2026-10-19. Green citations are official government records.

  1. 1.Analysis by Legislative Council, Proposition 144 · Arizona Legislative Council · 2026 Official record
  2. 2.Arizona 2026 General Election Publicity Pamphlet (November 3, 2026) · Arizona Secretary of State (Citizens Clean Elections Commission hosting) · 2026 Official record
  3. 3.Arizona Legislature floor-action and vote record · Arizona Legislature · 2026 Official record
  4. 4.Arizona Proposition 144 (2026) · Ballotpedia · 2026-10-16 Reference